Την 17/10/2002 5:00:56 μμ, ο/η "Callum Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
<snip> >I believe he has a sample already on it's way to him so he can make a >judgement on the likely time involved to produce them, etc. Yes he does have a sample on the way (Sent it today). > >On a similar note, does the replacement 'non-intrusive' keyboard discussed >here use the existing membrane, a custom one, or something different >entirely? If it's a custom one, could the quantity of membranes we can >register interest for be increased to accomodate the needs of this product? >I believe both are valuable to QL users, could happily co-exist, and we >could secure the production of both products at reasonable cost if the parts >are similar. The one MAJOR advantage of the Qeyboard is its ability of working with Aurora directly. As for its design, refer to Dave's email. Although the Qeyboard is not as responsive (I don't believe I am saying this :-) as the membrane (where are you Uncle?) it's the one thing that can replace the membrane without really fear of failure. ANY membrane will fail give it sufficient time and enough tinkering with the QLs inside but not the Qeyboard Phoebus
