??? 19/11/2002 10:35:14 ??, ?/? Steve Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????:

>
>If we're aiming that high, do we have Java RT (or better) on the wishlist? Might as 
>well 
put X on there too...


Java isn't that unreasonable... I believe it already runs on Q60 (under Linux) but I 
can 
tell you that AFTER I finish installation of Q40 Linux :-) As for X... already running 
on QL 
style hardware :-)


Phoebus
>
>Steve Oliver
>
>
>> 
>> From: Phoebus Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2002/11/19 Tue AM 12:57:05 EST
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: RE: [ql-users] One box or two
>> 
>> 
>> ??? 18/11/2002 6:33:43 ??, ?/? Dave P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????:
>> 
>> 
>> >What makes the QL not relevant is that people are WILLIGN to pay an arm
>> >and a leg to get something that will use up the resources of a 3GHz
>> >machine. Scary!
>> >
>> 
>> Yep and they end up losing the other two as well when they repeatedly bang them 
>> against the wall when the PeeCee hangs just at the moment they were backing the 
>> damn thing up :-)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >800MHz coming, eh? Anyone up for writing DVD/video s/w for SMSQ? :o)
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 800 MHz or not Video playback of ANY kind won't be feasible (unless you have 1Gig 
of 
>> memory or so) until true background IOSS operation is possible (ie rationalization 
>of 
the 
>> IO, metadrivers etc...)
>> 
>> 
>> Phoebus
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>-------
>Steve Oliver
>Oak Ridge TN
>
>



Reply via email to