Hello Oliver,

On 01/05/12 11:37, Oliver Eichler wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
>
> I am not sure if that does not collide with one of my latest changes. That is:
>
> * if the last waypoint name had no digit at the end the next new waypoint 
> will open the edit dialog
> * if the last waypoint name had a digit at the end the next new waypoint will 
> be set without the edit dialog
> * if the user changed the waypoint name to a name with digit at the end the 
> next new waypoint will be set without the edit dialog
> * if the user changed the waypoint name to a name without digit at the end 
> the next new waypoint will open the edit dialog
That does the trick for me.
(is that change already merged in main tree?)

If we don't want to clutter the configuration dialog with too many or
almost useless options, then forget about my patch.

>> PS: I must currently stick to SVN revision 3257 as source tree,
>> currently being stuck on Ubuntu 10.04 and QT 4.6 for development (the
>> changes made after 3257 introduce QT 4.7 dependencies that prevent a
>> successful build)
> That is bad, because it will cause trouble in the merge. What is the bad 
> dependency. Maybe we can work around.
If Albrecht's patch is merged into the main tree (which I confirm solves
the QT 4.7 dependency and Ubuntu 10.04 build issue), then problem is solved.

Thanks and cheers,

Cédric
>
>> PS2: I haven't forgotten about my planned "extended route support";
>> currently working on it ;-)
> Good :)
>
> Oliver
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users

Reply via email to