Hi Oliver,
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:06:34 +0200
"Oliver Eichler" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now to a less pleasant topic:
> Some of might have heard that Bitbucket drops Mercurial support. Well
> I am not particular a huge fan of Mercurial but compared to GIT it's
> way more easy to use. Plus it comes with a nice GUI tool TortoisHg.
> This makes it easy even for no full time software developers to use
> it and to contribute. That's why I favor it over GIT for a project
> like QMapShack.
now that all QMS related projects (QMapTool, ...) are in a single git
repository and (will be) part of a single release, I have a question
about versions. Can't we move them all (at least QMapTool) to follow the
version number of the main project? It would simplify packaging in
distros when eg. QMapTool is a separate subpackage built from the
single source, like in Fedora. Another option (for Fedora) would be to
provide eg. qmaptool-1.13.2, but the tool itself would report 1.1.1 in
its About dialog. Fiddling with different versions in a single source
package is confusing.
Also, could you make a new release that would include the formerly
standalone subprojects?
Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users
