Well, we tried "both", and that didn't work for us, so I looked through the
code and noticed that with "both", it doesn't set ldapprogdelivery, which
appears to be the flag in the code requisite to call the program set in
deliveryProgramPath, which is why I patched to add 'bothwithprog'.

On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:56:51PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:44:07PM -0700, Ben Ciaccio wrote:
> > We were facing a challenge where we wanted the ~/.qmail* to be honored
> > when qmailDotMode=ldapwithprog was set.  After working through the code,
> > it became apparent that the best way (for us) to resolve this issue was
> > to add another qmailDotMode (bothwithprog).
> > 
> > Below is my patch against our local qmail-ldap tree that we run to offer
> > such a feature.  This may or may not patch cleanly against other source
> > trees, and has not been tested against a straight 'qmail-ldap-patched'
> > tree, but it shouldn't be too hard to patch manually given the diff below.
> > 
> > 
> Your patch is not needed, qmailDotMode=both has program support enabled.
> If this isn't the case this is a bug. It does not make sens to disable
> program support if the user has an own account (at least he has a home
> with a .qmail file in it).
> 
> -- 
> later
> Claudio
> 
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to