We've been doing it that way for almost a year and haven't encountered a problem yet... It might be good to know which clients have this problem so we can be prepared if we ever do encounter it. Anybody know which ones might pose a problem? -Eric On July 13, 2001 06:43 am, pop corn wrote: > Thanks for answering my question! What are you going to do if there is a > problem with the @ sign as Henning pointed out? > > > From: Eric Paynter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "pop corn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Can't get auth_pop to auth! > >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 01:57:49 -0700 > > > >On July 13, 2001 12:13 am, you wrote: > > > Are you doing this in case you have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > > >Yes. Our business is hosting email, and therefore, we host many virtual > >domains. It is not uncommon to have matching user names with different > >domain > >names. Since the email address is always globally unique, we found this to > >be > >the best way to make the user id unique. > > > >Good luck solving your problems and I hope I solve mine soon. I can't wait > >to > >get qmail up and running and begone with our current system! > > > >-Eric > > > >-- > >arctic bears - the internet - your way. > >email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. > >http://www.arcticbears.com > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com -- arctic bears - the internet - your way. email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. http://www.arcticbears.com
