> This is whole discussion is moot. It doesn't change anything unless you
> go out and prove (that means write) a "qmail" that is multithreaded and
> due to that better than the qmail we right now.
Of course, it's going to turn into a flamewar. I am not arguing that Qmail
is not a very secure and reliable tool, like most of his tools. I was
planning to add state threads support to it just to see if there will
be any advantages (and IMO there would be), but haven't found resources
to do it.
> > New version of Apache (currently in beta) is multi-threaded if
> > you didn't know. Not only that, it has several choices of threading modules
> > sysadmin can choose for the 2.0.x Apache (including the cool State
> > Threads library).
>
> Yaddayaddayadda... "Profile, don't speculate!" Dan Bernstein.
>
> What kind of software have you written? Practice your theories!
>
> --
> Andre
