On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote: > I experienced the same problem, and no, the big-todo patch > won't help you a bit. What I did, and what I recommend to everyone, > is that you buy a SCSI controller that has at least 64MB NVRAM cache > on it (and preferably 128MB) with battery-backup. This results in mails > being processed *much* quicker, because in the preprocssing state, a lot > of file renaming and moving is done, and the nvram cache catches these > small things without even writing it to disk. > > Franky >
well, the problem is that queue disk seems to works really _fast_, but qmail-send is overloaded at the same time..... I think the problem _can_ be resolved by changing qmail source. Am I wrong ? has anyone other solutions to the problem ? Greetings -- Aleksander
