Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Could you check out this improved version? > > > > The mail attempt should not be rejected at the data phase but already > > at the time when a second rcpt-to is tried. Also it extends the bounce > > detection logic a bit (from the NOSPAM patch included in qmail-ldap).
It adds <#@[]> as another envelope sender which is only allowed to send messages to a single recipient. Is this valuable? I only ever see it used as the envelope sender for a double-bounce, which ideally shouldn't be delivered over the network. As for when smtpd issues the 5x code, why is it better to do it when the second RCPT TO command is issued? To me, that might make the sending MTA think the first address is valid, while the second address is not. Otherwise, the patch looks fine. Charles
