Henning Brauer writes:
> quite nicely shows a remote concurrency higher than 250 slows the process > down overall. > Of course this highly depends on a hughe number of external factors, but One such huge factor is memory. With some number of concurrency higher than 250, he might be swapping, and hence the poor performance result. I don't see if this happened on that page. I don't see any memory usage statistics either.
