hello, i try to install the new patch, but i got some "errors":
1) if i want to install the new patch over a clean qmail-1.03, i got the following message: The next patch would delete the file qmail-send.c.patch, which does not exist! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored The next patch would delete the file qmail-send2.c.orig, which does not exist! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored should i apply the qmail-send.c.patch first? -> if i accept the given "no"-answers, the patch seems to be installed. 2) if i then try to make the patched qmail-1.03 i got the follwing error: alloc.a substdio.a error.a str.a fs.a auto_qmail.o auto_split.o ./install install: fatal: unable to read ANTISPAM: file does not exist make: *** [setup] Fehler 111 seems that the ANTISPAM-file isn�t there, but it was there in the last qmail-ldap-patch. so i simply copy the ANTISPAM-file from an older version into qmail-1.03 bevor running make, and all works fine. maybe the ANTISPAM-File has to be included in the newest patch? afterall there is only one thing to say: thanks for the realy good work bye robert > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Andre Oppermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Mai 2002 23:36 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: new qmail-ldap release 20020501 available > > > Hello ldap fans > > A new qmail-ldap release called 20020501 is available. Is has the > following enhancements (from QLDAPNEWS): > > Add an external TODO processor program. This moves the queue todo > processing > out of qmail-send to avoid the silly qmail syndrome with > high injection > rates > (see EXTTODO for more info). Enable with -DEXTERNAL_TODO in Makefile. > > Major overhaul of qmail-smtpd. Completely restructured > anti-spam stuff > and > replaced DENYMAIL environment variable (settable through tcpserver) > with: > - SMTP550DISCONNECT to disconnect the smtp session > immediatly after a > fatal > 5xx error > - NOBOUNCE to reject null sender bounces > - SANITYCHECK to reject messages without @, no . in TLD, too > short/long TLD > - RETURNMXCHECK to check if the sender has an MX > - BLOCKRELAYPROBE to block rcptto containing !%@ before @ > from Russel > Nelson > - RBL to check RBLs > - RBLONLYHEADER to only add a X-RBL header > > added bouncemaxbytes patch: > to turn it on write the amount of bytes to bounce in the file > ~control/bouncemaxbytes. > Work inspired and mostly copied from Frank DENIS aka Jedi/Sector One. > > Bug fix in qmail-send.c log handling: > If in one read a log entry and a delivery status notification was > delivered the > status notification was dropped and therefor qmail-send did not close > the job. > > qmail-remote supports the smtp size extension as specified > by rfc 1870. > If the EHLO extension size is set qmail-remote sends size in the mail > form > commando. It does not parse the EHLO size argument to check > if the size > is > OK, the remote smtp server should decide if it is OK. > > clean up in qmail-remote, the starttls option was not compared in a > case > independend way as defined in rfc 2821. The tls debug option is now > called > TLSDEBUG. > > added Russ Nelson patch to qmail-remote to send using QMTP. > From his patch: > This patch to qmail-remote causes it to attempt qmtp first if the MX > priority > indicates so. Read http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt for more > information. > If you want this qmail-remote to be able to send email to you using > qmtp, > then you should be running a qmtpd on port 209, and you should have > your > lowest MX priority be 12801. > > added pop-before-smtp tools (see POPBEFORESMTP for more info). > > reject any null sender (bounce) smtp session with more than > one rcpt-to > (based on an idea of Charles Cazabon and some code of Henning Brauer) > > updated QLDAPINSTALL (more about those nasty -lresolv and ld.so > problems) > > beautified the output of the recieved line (added an additional > linebreak) > > Add a precedence bulk header when we forward a message to > more than one > recipient. So auto-reply programs at the recipients will not answer > such > mails. A message forwarded to more than one recipient is now > considered > a mailing list email. > > > You can grab it as usual from > > http://www.nrg4u.com > > > Have fun > -- > Andre > > This e-mail was scanned by RAV AntiVirus! > > Dieser Service wird Ihnen von der DGN-Service GmbH bereitgestellt! >
