Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:26:13AM -0800, Greg White wrote: > > On Thu Jan 01/23/03, 2003 at 12:20:17PM -0500, Matthew Crocker wrote: > > > Or, I gave the wrong domain ... OOPS it is integralis.com not > > > inteRgralis.com. They do have an MX record for the main domain but not > > > for the specific machine which is sending us the mail. > > > > Integralis.com doesn't matter, but _host_.integralis.com does -- does > > _host_.integralis.com accept connections on port 25? If so, IMHO you're > > the one violating the protocol -- RFC[2]821 explicitly allows fallback to > > A RRs in the complete absence of MX records. > > > > I checked the RETURNMXCHECK code and it does the fallback to A RRs in the > complete absence of MX records.
I knew of that problem. So when integrated the RETURNMXCHECK I put the A lookup in as well. > So RETURNMXCHECK does not violate RFC2821. -- Andre
