David Young wrote: > > Hi Andre, > > Attached are the headers of one of the suspect emails. Regrettably, I > have no qmail-send logs of the incident, because they were rotated > before I became aware of the problem. I've now drastically increased > multilog's MAXFILESIZE variable, so that I my logs will "go further back" :)
One more thing. Is this problem repeatable? What happens if <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> today tries to send another mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? Will the same happen again, or will it go through this time? -- Andre > Summary of the headers below... > > - the user at Afgri was not intended to receive the email. > - bob.net.lithotech.co.za is our primary mail server, all outgoing mail > goes via this server. It is running qmail-ldap 20030801 > - enzo.net.lithotech.co.za is a clusterhost at another branch, running > 20030501. > - The email was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (a user on > enzo) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - I've added "nospam" to the email addresses, to protect the users > from spambots > > Received: from afgri-relay (192.168.170.15 [192.168.170.15]) by > afgri-exch.otk.co.za with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service > Version 5.5.2653.13) > id RHHFTYVV; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:24:24 +0200 > Received: from bob.net.lithotech.co.za ([165.233.49.45]) by afgri-relay with > InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:23:15 +0200 > Received: (qmail 16427 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 07:11:32 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO enzo.net.lithotech.co.za) ([172.16.41.62]) > (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > by bob.net.lithotech.co.za (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA > encrypted compressed SMTP > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 29 Sep 2003 07:11:25 -0000 > Received: (qmail 6360 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 07:12:57 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO bisheng) ([172.16.41.197]) > (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > by enzo.net.lithotech.co.za (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 29 Sep 2003 07:12:54 -0000 > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Bishen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: did we look at this one? > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:14:36 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01C3866A.1A52DF80" > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) > Importance: Normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > > Andre Oppermann wrote: > > David Young wrote: > > > >>Hi All, > >> > >>I'm also experiencing this problem... > > > > > > We have had a bug in 20030901 which caused some cluster problems. > > This is one is going to be fixed in 20031001. > > > > I can't image what could be the cause of this for release 20030801a. > > There aren't any changes in the recipient handling functions compared > > to 20030501. > > > > While running different versions of qmail-ldap within a cluster should > > as such not be a problem, I don't recommend it. It might be that > > different clusterhosts have different handling of some ldap attributes > > (due to bug fixes or feature enhancements). > > > > It would be really helpful if you could provide some email headers and > > qmail logs which correspond to this incident. > > > > ------- > This e-mail and attachments are confidential/legally privileged and any > unauthorised use, distribution or disclosure thereof, in whatever form, > by anyone other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received > this e-mail in error, please destroy it. The views and opinions in this > e-mail and attachments may not necessarily be those of the Directors and > Management of the Lithotech Group of Companies. The aforementioned does > not accept any liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from > this e-mail and/or from accessing any attachments.
