how reliable is ClamAV is? does the virus definitions provided are always up-to-date?
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Taymour A. El Erian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:02:44 +0300 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Seferovic Edvin wrote: > >|Hi >| >|I have been looking for such a solution for a long time. I already know >|about clamav etc, but I havent found any step by step tutorial how to >|implement it. >| >|Thx and best regard >| >|Edvin Seferovic >| >|-----Original Message----- >|From: Kamau, Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2004 10:32 >|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >|Subject: RE: what is the most recommended AV for qmail-ldap? >| >|You may look at Qmail-scanner using SpamAssassin and ClamAV anti-virus. >| >|Allan >| >|-----Original Message----- >|From: Hiu Yen Onn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:14 >|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|Subject: what is the most recommended AV for qmail-ldap? >| >|what is the most protection tools for qmail-ldap? it may include >|email-spammer, email-viruscanner, antivirus... and bla..bla...bla... >|what is the product on the market right now is the most reliable, and >yet, >|it is economical. or perhaps, what is the newest or reliable tool on the >|market to protect my mail server? pls advise. thanks. >| >|cheers, >|yenonn >| >| >| > >just go to qmail-scanner.sf.net, the installation steps are there and >so easy. > >- -- >Taymour A El Erian >System Division Manager >CNA, MCSE, CCNA, LPIC >T.E. Data >E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Web: www.tedata.net >Tel: +(202)-4166600 >Fax: +(202)-4166700 >Ext: 1101 > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) >Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > >iD8DBQFA4oG0X1dv4NHexooRAkylAJ9WsfQyqiM2clMZLXv+6ghdCZknVQCgngoO >jAGr1WuO6tbrdLQyzjAX0RI= >=lvZW >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >