| ï
> Isn't part of this functionality already in the "ldap-controls"
patch??
> Dougal
Part of it, yes. But, at first, i decided not to use this patch in my servers because: - My tests
with ldap-controls didn't work as I expected - they failed.
- ldap-controls doesn't have a
mailling list for it.
- The author of this patch is
not easly accessible. I've asked him something and he took 5 days to answer
me.
- ldap-controls forces the
binaries to consume much more memory than the binaries without it.
This schema is a solution to work
with qmail-ldap + virtual domains without the need of other
softwares.
And it improves organization in the configurations
for virtual domains. At least, this is what I think.
bruno.
|
