Spam detection software, running on the system "mail3.optical.com.mx", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > > And I'm also sure it won't cause any harm if
people start being aware > Andre is the author of both documents. Will
it cause any harm? > I aspire to documentation with quality like the
FreeBSD Handbooks or Debian Guides. It takes time, and in my opinion
Bruno is very willing to cooperate but is using a bad approach. I
guess he feels gratituted for qmail-ldap authors and wants to show it
in every manner, but his posts, announcing every thought he has or
every change he mades tires me. I do a change and suggest something
and he argues with childish arguments. And like I wont be in a fight
of reverting changes in wiki or correcting things made by Buno's
criteria, I retire. I dont have the energy or time to start a revert
changes war. Is sad that for one person who wants to get and give
credit and gratitude(so his posts make me think), he can control the
wiki and with stuborness drive the site in a wrong direction. A
project like qmail-ldap should have focus in formal documents, we need
a site with structure and good content. More that one people should
decide on that. And Bruno, please reply to the mailing list, dont send
me private messages anymore. If one day the circumstances change, let
me know and Ill be very glad to cooperate again. [...]
Content analysis details: (5.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4895]
3.8 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org
[<http://dsbl.org/listing?200.78.52.122>]
0.4 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy
[200.78.52.122 listed in combined.njabl.org]
0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[200.78.52.122 listed in combined.njabl.org]
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[200.78.52.122 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
-1.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
--- Begin Message ---
And I'm also sure it won't cause any harm if people start being aware
Andre is the author of both documents. Will it cause any harm?
I aspire to documentation with quality like the FreeBSD Handbooks or
Debian Guides. It takes time, and in my opinion Bruno is very willing to
cooperate but is using a bad approach.
I guess he feels gratituted for qmail-ldap authors and wants to show it
in every manner, but his posts, announcing every thought he has or every
change he mades tires me.
I do a change and suggest something and he argues with childish
arguments. And like I wont be in a fight of reverting changes in wiki or
correcting things made by Buno's criteria, I retire. I dont have the
energy or time to start a revert changes war.
Is sad that for one person who wants to get and give credit and
gratitude(so his posts make me think), he can control the wiki and with
stuborness drive the site in a wrong direction.
A project like qmail-ldap should have focus in formal documents, we need
a site with structure and good content. More that one people should
decide on that.
And Bruno, please reply to the mailing list, dont send me private
messages anymore.
If one day the circumstances change, let me know and Ill be very glad to
cooperate again.
Omar
--- End Message ---
