Ed,
The patch file you sent to me was 0 bytes long. Can you resend it again?
Thank you,
bnegrao
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Cates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruno Negrao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: qmail-ldap-virtual applyied with fuzz
On Saturday 09 July 2005 15:04, you wrote:
Hi Kristof,
I tried to apply your patch upon qmail-ldap 20050401a and it reported
the
following messages. Can you say if this is bad?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-1.03]# patch <
/root/pacotes/QMAIL_WORLD/qmail-ldap-virtual.20040701.patch
patching file Makefile
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2185 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines).
patching file VIRTUAL.readme
patching file checkpassword.c
patching file qldap.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 186 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 274 (offset 2 lines).
patching file qldap.h
patching file qmail-ldap.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 187 (offset 1 line).
And I see your patch is for version 20040701. Would you update it?
Thank you very much,
bnegrao
Bruno,
As long as the patch doesn't "FAIL" anywhere you should be good to go.
I'm mulling over a good way to include/exclude Kristof's patch in a
qmail-ldap
ebuild I'm working on for Gentoo Linux (I would say the current ebuild
sucks,
but only if it actually worked), and have updated it for the latest
qmail-ldap patch. Let me know how this works for you (attached).
--Ed
