On Tuesday, 7 March 2006 00:10, Ed Cates wrote: > Much thanks, Scott! > > One last question: You haven't noticed any other problems with RELAYCLIENT > settings with the change to the SPP code? I realize it was just one line, > but I'm just trying to be cautious.
No, we have not noticed any further issues. We are not an open relay and we now no longer reject mails because of relaying denied. I have been testing this for a couple of weeks now and so far so good!. It looks to me (and I'm no programmer - not C anyway!) that there is an incorrect decision upon the relayclient env attribute. But the good people from spp who are for more intelligent than I on these matters are investigating.... Thanks. > > Thanks again, > --Ed > > On Monday 06 March 2006 16:44, Scott Ryan wrote: > > On Monday, 6 March 2006 23:23, Ed Cates wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > > > Does this patch exibit the no-relaying bug you posted on the > > > qmail-spp-general list at sourceforge? I had this problem earlier > > > getting qmail-spp to work with qmail-ldap. > > > > My apologies... Yes it does. Here is the fixed version > > > > <snip> -- slr, ISP Systems Specialist Telkom Internet #qmail, #qmail-ldap & #mandriva@ irc.freenode.net "Windows?? You mean the thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition? Oh, that..." -- Lee Clarke This message has been made from 100% recycled bits. ----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT/MU/E d? s+:+ a- C++++>+++++ USL++++$ P++++ !E(---)W+@ !N o?(--) K? !w(---) O- M+ V PS+@ PE Y-- PGP++>+++ !t(---) !5 !X R-- !tv b(++) DI++ !D(----) G+++>++++ e++>* h----(*) r+++ y++++ -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
pgpbhLYw8jejO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
