On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:19:41PM -0700, chris wrote: > Not to say qmail-scanner is anything less than GREAT!! It is - and I thank > you! But there's always room for improvement. Seems like going to C would > be the next logical step...
Absolutely fine idea. However, there are reasons why perl is classified as a RAD language, and C isn't. I've got no problem with C - except that I suck at it. (there, I said it). I am instead looking at "daemonizing" Qmail-Scanner with a tiny C frontend that just calls it - like SpamAssassin. However, that's definitely Q-S v3 material - not even v2... However, if you or anyone else is hot at C, be my guests :-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
