On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 16:41, Ronneil Camara wrote: > Hi Rick, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rick Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:31 PM > > To: Ronneil Camara > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner integration > > > > > > I think 2.2 of the toaster includes the qmailqueue patch > > already (I use > > 1.7), otherwise that's the biggest hurdle I ran into : Merging in the > > qmailqueue patch with everything else Matt had in there. > > If this is the case, your telling me that I am all set. Right?
Yep, just follow the part for having qmail-queue run qmail-scanner. > > > IMHO, It's not qmail-scanner you need to worry about, it's the virus > > scanner you use along with it. > > Ok. How much RAM would you recommended then? Can we configure qmail-scanner > not to scan attachments bigger than, say, 10mb? > And would you know how to compute for the memory usage? Actually, it's not the size of an attachment, as much as it is concurrent virus scanning processes. Based on my available RAM+Swap, I think I guestimated 10MB per virus scan process. So I reduced the max number of concurrent qmail-smtp processes to 25 (from 100, IIRC). I'll be out of town for a week, and I can't remember exactly where that was off the top of my head, but it's in the mail-toaster archives (2 or 3 months ago). Rick > > > > For FreeBSD, I've only tried Kaspersky's AVP, which works quite well. > > I'll try this one. > > Neil -- -- Rick Romero IT Manager Valeo, Inc. ph: 262.695.4841 Sussex, WI. fax: 262.695.4850 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
