I have another question about this modification.... How hard would it be to...let's say in a virtual hosting situation.... Every time a user is added to my e-mail system, also add a spambox for that user.
Now, every time a spam comes in addressed to a valid user on the system... Forward to that users spambox. Like [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also... What about user level spamassasin configs... I've been toying with the idea of offering higher end hosting customers a usermode linux virtual machine... In this case, I would develop some sort of web interface for adjusting the spamassasin ruleset... Users could tweak their own settings...or at least for the master spamassasin server.(tweak per domain) -----Original Message----- From: David Raistrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:41 PM To: Barry Smoke Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner and SpamAssassin, modifications for quarantine On 15 Oct 2002, Barry Smoke wrote: > did you get my last message on automating the install, vs.. > having to change the -c by hand after install? I did...I replied, but I'm not sure what happened to it. Hmmmm.. ./configure --scanners verbose_spamassassin Will force qmailscanner to not use the -c. see ./configure --help In this case I think you'll need to specify what AV scanners to use, if any, as well, though. take a look at http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/FAQ.php section 12 You may be able to adjust the templates to default to verbose instead of fast for "auto"....I'm not sure. sorry my last reply didnt make it. (it didnt make it to my sent mail, either...must have been a monday.) thanks. ...david > > I'd like to announce to the list an easier way to install it... > > On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 13:00, David Raistrick wrote: > > > > > my $spamc_binary='/usr/bin/spamc'; > > > my $spamc_options=' -c -f'; > > > > Ah ha! > > > > I've run into this one before, though I'd forgotten about it. Pull the -c > > from the spamc options and see how it goes. > > > > I'm not sure (now..though I hazily recall figuring it out once) exactly > > why this doesnt work...Something to do with where/when qmail-scanner adds > > the X-Spam-Status: header. > > > > I prefer, though for higher load situations I can see why someone wouldnt, > > to let SA rewrite the message... > > > > Let me know if dropping the -c works for you. > > > > (I seem to recall there being a bug with SA 2.40 maybe regarding -c and > > qmail-scanner as well....hmm.) > > > > ...david > > > > --- > > david raistrick > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html > > > > > > > --- david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
