On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:58:27PM -0500, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote: > Do you see any problems adding support for spambayes? Would you like me to > help you do it?
It won't be easy. I'm in love with SpamAssassin and as such, have "done things" with it that aren't scalable to other anti-spam measures - namely the addition of the X-Spam-Status header. i.e. there's a sub-spamassassin subroutine PLUS changes to the core code. If Q-S is to support other anti-spam options, then that code should be abstracted out to being more generic. I have no personal interest in supporting anything besides SA, but you are of course welcome to do the work yourself. If you can create a sub-spambayes.pl file plus a patch, send them through :-) [as far as abstracting out the header problem goes, probably defining a $var that if set ends up being added as an extra header to each message would be the way to go...] -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
