On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:01:34PM +0300, Pasi K�rkk�inen wrote: > There was some discussion on the list about the 1.20rc3 f-secure 4.5x returncode > handling.. because the returncodes have changed. was there any conclusion, does > the 1.20rc3 do the right thing or do we need to change the code more..
As far as I'm aware, there are no issues with 1.20rc3 with the newer f-secure. Anyone who knows different, please fix and send us the patch... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
