CertaintyTech-Ed wrote:
I have been using QS only for sometime and am considering using turning
on fast_spamassassin module that is offered with it. I will be using
spamd/spamc combination. Am wondering what load increase one would
expect with QS+SA over QS only?
Thanks for any real life feedback,
Hi,
Double or triple or more the load if you are running SA on the same machine. We run spamd on a seperate server for three of our inbound mail servers, and we find that is the best solution for any high volume of mail.
If you are under 10-20K a day mails you should be fine if you have a beefy enough machine. We scan about 20k emails a day on a 1GHz Duron with clamav and verbose_spamassassin with the load always staying below 1.00.
Regards,
Rick
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
