Hey, it looks like some of your email systems don't see the difference between a header and something in the body that appears to be a header! So I prefixed these with a (+) sign.
Here's a ham I just got:
+Received: from 216.55.149.18 by myserver.us (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25st
(hbedv: 6.29.0.16/6.29.0.150. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st.
Clear:RC:0(216.55.149.18):SA:0(0.1/6.6):.
Processed in 13.041635 secs); 02 Mar 2005 04:52:01 -0000
+X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=6.6
(etc.) (etc.) (etc.)
+X-Spam-Score: 00.1/6.6
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on ibm.nlcc.us
+X-Spam-Level:
+X-Spam-Language: en sco
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=6.6 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_FONT_BIG,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.0.2
+X-Spam-RBL: <dns:ddd.us?type=MX> [10 smtp.ddd.us, 15 ddd.us.]
+X-Spam-Check-Version: Spamassassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on myserver.us
+X-Spam-Status1: No, 00.1/6.6
+X-Spam-autolearn: no
That looks right to me now.
Billy
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
At 14:03 +0100 28-02-2005, Matthias Blaser wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
With Spamassassin 3.x the header displaying the spam scores change from 'hits=' to 'score=' but qmail-scanner looks for 'hits='... so you have to change the pattern:
the line to change looks like this (only have 1.22 here, I suppose it's the same problem with 1.25)
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
