On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 08:34:00PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> BTWY, if John wants to make rpm, perhaps he may want to consider the
> idea I wrote down about two weeks ago about how to make an rpm that
> would use idedit, but rpm could also be used to verify the whole
> package (including the "bad" binaries).
Two things:
1) I understand and agree that a multiple-stage confirmation process
is possible. The argument against this is the disire to do
MD5 checksums against trusted read-only media. I'm not saying
I agree, just that this is the argument.
2) Ultimately, I've stopped caring about the ``issues'' surrounding
rpm distribution of qmail. In my mind, now, it's a matter of
solving the problem and moving on.
--
John White
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key: http://www.triceratops.com/john/public-key.pgp
