On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 02:35:10PM +0000, Richard Letts wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > Err.. this is _very_ common practice, actually. I'm on a fixed-IP
> > dialup, but I'm my own primary MX nonetheless. Any mailhost failing to
> > deliver to a secondary MX is Very Broken(tm). Can you name one MTA which
> > is that stupid?
>
> the secondary MX
Err... come again?
Ok.. let me rephrase my question: do you know one MTA which is so stupid that it will
not deliver to a secondary MX if the primary MX is down?
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
