> > Sendmail is *the* UNIX mailer. Everyone knows how to work it. It's > well documented, well proven, and hopefully most of the major bugs > have been found. We can tweak the source any way we see fit. Not > many (paying) customers are complaining about it. Sure, qmail is > better, but when we compare the benefits to the costs, it doesn't > make economic sense to switch. Ahem! if you are installing a system from scratch (as i did about 5 months ago) and you read horror stories about what a pain it is to admin sendmail, it makes perfectly good sense to install what you want when you are loading the operating system..:) In my case, i installed Qmail v1.03 and never have looked back (except for a few small problems, etc).. -Bill
- Re: DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibil... Dax Kelson
- Re: DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibil... Marius Vollmer
- Re: DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibil... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delus... Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity verification and other delus... Vern Hart
- var-qmail packages and qmail-run packages D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delus... Mate Wierdl
- Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Bill Parker
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Peter C. Norton
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Peter C. Norton