i'm sorry i did not make my question clear,
is it a popular thing to do as aol.com as done?
i'm debating recompiling qmail here. but it seems that the patch is no big
deal so i might as well do it.
also may i add that it's not aol, it's not qmail, but it would be the rfc
that states the correct behavior, and qmail abides by it.
thanks,
-xs
end
+-------------------------------------+
|Greg Albrecht KF4MKT [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|Safari Internet www.safari.net|
|Fort Lauderdale, FL 1-888-537-9550|
+-------------------------------------+
On 19 Apr 1999, Scott Schwartz wrote:
>xs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>| hey all, as long as we're talking about aol.com's problems when using
>| qmail and what not.
>
>AOL does not have a problem. It's a bug in qmail. Period.
>
>| does anyone know of any other sites that are known to
>| have the same such problem?
>
>Sure. There are a number of sites at PSU that exercise this qmail bug.
>
>
