> From:  Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:  22 Apr 1999 14:05:36 -0000
>
> Dave Sill writes:
>  > "Racer X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >so we can all see the huge number of patches that are listed on
>  > >www.qmail.org, and i'd be willing to bet that anyone who has used qmail
>  for
>  > >more than a day or so has had to use at least one of those patches.
>  > 
>  > You'd lose. I've used qmail heavily for three years and I don't use
>  > any patches anywhere.
> 
> I'm only using the rbl patch, and that only because I wrote it before
> Dan wrote rblsmtpd.

I'm also not using any patches.  I used Sam's anti-spam patch for a while, but 
it got too many false positives, so I backed it off the systems I had it on.  
(The client who had insisted I install it found that mail from their VC firm 
was being bounced!)

>  > >it might be interesting if people had a way to rate the usefulness of
>  > >various patches, both for general usefulness and how well the patch
>  > >integrates into qmail (that is, whether it should really be a patch or 
> a
>  > >separate program).
>  > 
>  > It would be interesting to know who's using which patches and why. One 
>  > of Dan's main objections to patches is that they make it hard for him
>  > to tell what really needs to be changed in qmail. If one has problem X 
>  > with qmail, and there's a patch that fixes problem X on www.qmail.org, 
>  > most people just install the patch and never complain to Dan.
> 
> The problem with that theory is that, when someone complains to Dan,
> he dismisses their concern as trivial and frivolous.  Given the choice 
> between being insulted, and actually getting your problem solved by
> installing a patch, which would you choose?

Even so, it would be interesting to know who's using which patches and why.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 virCIO
+1 512 432 4046                 4314 Avenue C                    O-
http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/   Austin, TX  78751-3709
                                +1 512 374 0500

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
      but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.


PGP signature

Reply via email to