On 26-Jan-99 16:06:07, Fred Lindberg wrote something about "Unable to run qmail-remote
from resource exthaustion PERMENENT error?". I just couldn't help replying to it, thus:
> Testing ezmlm stuff on a 486/32MB I ran into some resource exhaustion,
> and noticed that qmail-remote crashing is a permanent error, while an
> inability to fork qmail-remote is a permanent error. This seems
> incorrect and caused loss of a message.
> Log (the second entry is a crash leading to the expected deferral):
> Jan 26 11:56:10 id qmail: 917351770.477256 status: local 0/10 remote
> 40/40
> Jan 26 11:56:10 id qmail: 917351770.832994 delivery 7497: failure:
> Unable_to_run_qmail-remote./
I saw the same thing today. Resource exhaustion (memory) leading to that
error message and bounced mail. Not good at all.
Regards,
/ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻTŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64) | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC |
| If you wake up Sleepy & Grumpy, you must be Snow White. |
