Hi all.
According to RFC822:
>4.3.1. RETURN-PATH
>
> This field is added by the final transport system that
> delivers the message to its recipient. The field is intended
> to contain definitive information about the address and route
> back to the message's originator.
Return-Path is added by the *final* transport system. So why is it added by
qmail-inject?
On the same subject, if I send an email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] without
the Return-Path field (e.g. by using qmail-queue) but using VERP (so that
the envelop sender becomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]), the
email.com server writes the Return-Path as <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stripping everything left of the equal sign.
As far as I can tell this only happens with email.com (and other domain
names they host). Is this a problem with their mail server or should I
always include the Return-Path field, against RFC822?
Thanks.
David.
______________________________________
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
