On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:42:34 +0100, Alex at Star wrote: >> Syslog is crap. Pure junk >We also saw a lot of our performance problems disappear when we moved from syslog to >cyclog As has been pointed out before, a simple '-' before the maillog file name in syslog.conf (see man page) will prevent sync() after each entry. This realizes most of the performance gains seen with cyclog. I obviously still prefer cyclog, but the syslog.conf change followed by a syslogd HUP is a very fast and simple fix when seeing a system in trouble. -Sincerely, Fred (Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! Alex at Star
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! jeremy
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. Ple... John R. Levine
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... Chris Garrigues
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... Russell Nelson
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues aga... Russell Nelson
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... johnjohn
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues aga... Bruce Guenter
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... vogelke
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! Fred Lindberg