-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Dan's anonftpd chroots itself, and there's no way out. Crackers simply
> cannot break authentication because there *is* no authentication.
> Anybody can download only the files in the ftpd directory. Anything
> else is less secure.
Does any anon ftp these days *not* chroot?
I use wuftpd-vr17 or so. What's insecure with that?
> > What's the deal with DJB's FTP with no LS and crazy
> > filenames?
> Isn't it about time we had an ftp server which cooperated with a
> visual ftp client by giving it an easily parsed listing format?
I don't know if I understand.... if you can't get an LS, how do yo
expect to use a visual ftp? is visual different than ncftp (with tab
completion?)
Scott
ps: I was interested in checking out DJB FTPD ... is it available?
I looked briefly but I don't remember finding it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBN6dRxB4PLs9vCOqdAQHMNAQAkf8YcuD2V15a/Va4VmuINrrpIjxfUdPo
k+UYhEszWS8aQPV141K8kWEOxPXZ+kTHZ2o/obXUyVS8fEXqj80UqEZRRSRbS1O7
1hPj65yZxo2baDPOn4g2yUM9ptQBwa44tyip/iVNSEOYSjf2o9Ccv9SUbYtvwTQS
IljKx6VNMUw=
=oWI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
