Aaron Nabil writes: > The message in question had a "bare LF" in it, perfectly legal, Bare LFs are now categorically prohibited by 822bis. They were never handled correctly by sendmail. The client's behavior is inexcusable. ---Dan
- 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. Robin Bowes
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. Aaron Nabil
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.htm... Russell Nelson
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf... Aaron Nabil
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/sm... Russell Nelson
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/do... Aaron Nabil
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.htm... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf... Aaron Nabil
- Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/sm... Aaron Nabil
- Re: bare line feeds John R. Levine