James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten >a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of >configuration standpoint. 1) Lack of reported vulnerabilities <> more secure. 2) Sendmail's performance still lags far behind current-generation MTA's. -Dave
- pine patches Mate Wierdl
- Re: pine patches James Smallacombe
- Re: pine patches Dave Sill
- Re: pine patches David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: pine patches Chris Garrigues
- Re: pine patches Russell Nelson
- Patched source for pine 4.1 w/ Maildir support WAS ... James Smallacombe
- RE: pine patches Soffen, Matthew