On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:31:04AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also agree entirely with this. vmailmgrd deserves more recognition and
> use, the qmail home page description "IP based" wording does need to be
> improved if possible, because I avoided vmailmgrd for many months thinking
> it irrelevant to my needs. I don't know if you get a word limit, but "which
> implements either IP-based or non IP-based virtual domains." perhaps?
>
> As for posting announcements to the qmail list, I think definately yes.
> Again increases awareness, and to be honest (and I get ready for a large
> amount of backlash on this one!) vmailmgrd is one of the main reasons I've
> stuck with qmail for so long.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I love qmail, but it appears to me (and I hope I'm
> wrong) that it has queue management issues under high loads and under
> certain circumstances (when hotmail went down a couple of months ago and had
> no secondary MX record for instance). In this particular instance I had to
> create hotmail.com in my own DNS with false MX records in order to bounce
> the vast backlog of queued email that was slowing down everyone elses mail.
> (yeah yeah, I know, hotmails fault for only having one MX record, but
> still...)
hotmail's incoming mail is not handled by qmail.
Greetz, Peter
--
| 'He broke my heart, | Peter van Dijk |
I broke his neck' | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
nognikz - As the sun | Hardbeat@ircnet - #cistron/#linux.nl |
http://www.nognikz.mdk.nu/ | Hardbeat@undernet - #groningen/#kinkfm/#vdh |
