On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't say that. It says it 'counts bytes AS stored on
> > disk', not
> > 'counts bytes AFTER they're stored on disk'. There's a difference. A
> > quick look at the sources will confirm this.
> >
>
> Vince,
>
> Thanks by your correction.
>
> However, I verified that the messages stored on disk (in queue/mess
> directory) don't include the CR+LF sequences but LF caracters.
> Moreover, the value recorded in qmail logs is exactly the data message
> size without the CR+LF number.
>
> Therefore the size used by qmail is different from the size used by
> ESMTP SIZE extension.
>
> Even more, if the message size is counted during the transmission, I
> don't understand why is used the disk meaning.
The disk meaning is the message size without the headers. The network
size is the size of the message with the headers (as I understand it).
I've never worried that much nor paid attention to the storage of LF
vs. CR/LF. It's been my experience that Dan does the right thing.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
