-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am not saying it's a bad idea, but a few things need to be pointed
out:
1. It's usual to publish a patch, not a patched source.
2. The badip idea seems confusing; why shouldn't tcpserver or
inetd take care about that? After all, qmail-smtpd might just as well
read from the keyboard/file instead of socket.
3. If you're saying "no" in SMTP, it can't be with a code 221. It
must be 4xx (temporary) or 5xx (permanent).
4. What's the silly idea of saying "no" to vrfy? "maybe" is much
better.
But again, I am not saying your ideas are wrong - I'm only saying I
don't like them :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
iQA/AwUBN+tPpFMwP8g7qbw/EQLvVgCg4VXi3cmAy/ncQ1AwhAse7XjlRSYAoL5S
JwTC8Quy4RnLKTg9EeXvXw5p
=W4RB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
[Tom Waits]
