*confused look*
Strange, either something IS speech, or it isn't (in my opinion anyways)..
This is going to be one HELL of a legal precedent setting case if the deCSS
defendants can't present more evidence in their favor.
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iv0 [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 10:35 AM
> To: Soffen, Matthew
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Off Topic: Bernstein vs. US DOJ Text of ruling
>
>
> If you read what the Judge said in the DeCSS case in New York, he
> stated that the courts are not clear on this issue. He sited
> the Bernstein case as "it is speech" and cited some other cases
> as "it is not speech".
>
> Ken Jones
>
> "Soffen, Matthew" wrote:
> >
> > I am wondering if this ruling is available online ?
> >
> > The reason in I ask is that in the deCSS case the judge has stated that
> > software is NOT speech, If memory serves me correct, the judge in Dan's
> case
> > stated that software IS speech.
> >
> > Thanks for any help !
> >
> > Matt Soffen
> > Applications Developer
> > http://www.iso-ne.com/
> > ==============================================
> > Boss - "My boss says we need some eunuch programmers."
> > Dilbert - "I think he means UNIX and I already know UNIX."
> > Boss - "Well, if the company nurse comes by, tell her I said
> > never mind."
> > - Dilbert -
> > ==============================================
