qmail Digest 9 Feb 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 906
Topics (messages 36922 through 36964):
Amavis and Qmail, how?
36922 by: Erwin van Kroonenburg
36935 by: Roland Pelzer
fetchmail with forcecr option
36923 by: Martin Lesser
multiple qmail instances
36924 by: Jiri Rosenmayer
36936 by: Stefan Paletta
qmail and ldap
36925 by: nsaravanan.md.in.dsqsoft.com
Qmail and IMAP
36926 by: Mullen, Patrick
qmail anti-spamming
36927 by: Sergio Sagliocco
36937 by: Martin A. Brown
unable to bind
36928 by: clifford thurber
36929 by: Vince Vielhaber
Re: RH RPM POP3 problemo!!!
36930 by: Mate Wierdl
multiple aliases for each user
36931 by: Max
36932 by: Magnus Bodin
36933 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: Can I rewrite *@xx to *@yyy?
36934 by: Matthew Brown
courier-imapd + vmailmgr
36938 by: Steve Kondik
36939 by: Barry Smoke
qmail-imap, cyrus imap, qmail
36940 by: Mullen, Patrick
36949 by: Russell Nelson
36951 by: Sam
36952 by: Greg Owen
Qmail & Majordomo
36941 by: Andrew Scott
courier-imap rpm
36942 by: Barry Smoke
36943 by: Sam
36944 by: Barry Smoke
36945 by: Sam
Big and/or famous sites using qmail?
36946 by: Michael Boman
36947 by: Glenn Crownover
36948 by: Jacob Joseph
36950 by: Magnus Bodin
36960 by: Magnus Bodin
36964 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
concurrencyremote
36953 by: Benjamin de los Angeles Jr .
36954 by: Anand Buddhdev
virus scanners
36955 by: Alok Bhatt
36957 by: Hans Sandsdalen
36958 by: Alex at Starlabs
36961 by: Rainer Link
viewing an ezmlm archive with web
36956 by: Barry Smoke
Problem Found
36959 by: Ewen Fung
IMAP and vchkpw
36962 by: Derek Smith
36963 by: Magnus Bodin
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Maybe someone can help me with the following problem:
I got a qmail-1.03 mailserver and am trying to use
amavis-0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-5 with it. I followed the installation
instructions from www.unixzone.com/virus and compiled amavis with
"configure --enable-qmail".
The problem is that everything I send by mail containing a virus passes the
scanner, so the virus is not detected at all.
I know scanmails works because when I place "|/usr/sbin/scanmails" in
~/.qmail the virus is detected.
Can anyone who is using the same configuration tell me what to do or how
you managed to get it to work?
Regards,
Erwin
Telematica International
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: +31-(0)495-547700
fax: +31-(0)495-548411
>Hi,
>
>Maybe someone can help me with the following problem:
>
>I got a qmail-1.03 mailserver and am trying to use
>amavis-0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-5 with it. I followed the installation
>instructions from www.unixzone.com/virus and compiled amavis with
>"configure --enable-qmail".
>The problem is that everything I send by mail containing a virus passes the
>scanner, so the virus is not detected at all.
>I know scanmails works because when I place "|/usr/sbin/scanmails" in
>~/.qmail the virus is detected.
Seems that scanmail will not be started in your current configuration. Have
you moved qmail-local / qmail-remote to qmail-local-real an
qmail-remote-real, and added the symbolic links for qmail-local /
qmail-remote to scanmail?
My installation using amavis-0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-4 runs very smooth.
- Roland
Looking through man fetchmail I read:
The 'forcecr' option controls whether lines terminated by LF only are
given CRLF termination before forwarding. Strictly speaking RFC821
requires this, but few MTAs enforce the requirement it so this option
is normally off (only one such MTA, *qmail*, is in significant use at
time of writing).
Searching the list-archive I've seen many postings which contain forcecr
as an option in the .fetchmailrc file.
I'am not using this option and qmail works without problems. Furthermore
reading http://cr.yp.to/smtp/request.html I can't see any reason for
using the forcecr option. Dan Bernstein only recommends that servers
should look only for LF.
So my questions are:
- Is the forcecr option obsolet for the use with qmail?
- Have there been problems with fetchmail and qmail without this option?
TIA, Martin
Folks,
I've one question. I need to run multiple instances of qmail.
I need different behavior of qmail on every interface of our firewall.
On DMZ, there is some postcard system and on this interface I need to
set shorter queuelifetime. On outside interface I need filter mail
through QMAILQUEUE patch - I need to filter out e-mails with attached .exe
file. Inside interface rewrites some From: lines.
So, my quetion is ? Can I change qmail root from /var/qmail ??
Is there some other solution for my problem ??
J.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiri Rosenmayer e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SkyNet a. s. http://www.pgp.cz
PGP fingerprint: 1907 1F79 CC70 74EE FC55 F649 5651 33A4 50D4 ABB9
Jiri Rosenmayer wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> So, my quetion is ? Can I change qmail root from /var/qmail ??
This is configured in the conf-qmail file in the source directory.
Stefan
Hi all
I am trying to integrate qmail with LDAP. Please provide me details about the
integration steps to be followed.
What LDAP can be used ?
I tried on openldap . I have some problem. Is there any document available on
qmail and ldap integration which lame man like me can understand
Thanks in advance
How do you set up Cyrus IMAPd to work with QMail? In particular, I
would like to do the "single system UID for all mail accounts" trick as
well as the selective SMTP relaying after authenticating through
POP or IMAP using TCPServer. The latter I already have by using
the patch to checkpassword, but I'm pretty sure that won't work
with Cyrus so I'll need a new method of implementing it.
Thanks,
~Patrick
Is there a way to avoid spamming using SSL and/or certificate X.509?
Sergio,
<disclaimer>
First, let me state that I don't think you gain any "real" leverage
against determined spammers by using SMTPS as opposed to SMTP, however,
there are probably far fewer spammers trying to use SMTPS as opposed to
plaintext SMTP, because there are misconfigured SMTP servers all over the
net...so spammers will always look for the easier targets.
</disclaimer>
You should be able to use stunnel and openssl to generate (and sign) your
own certificates which then wrap the SMTP session in the SSL layer. The
docs are not plentiful, but should suffice. stunnel will run quite
happily under tcpserver, by the way...
Typically, SMTPS listens on port 465.
stunnel: http://mike.daewoo.com.pl/computer/stunnel/
openssl: http://www.openssl.org/
Best of luck,
-Martin
--
Martin A. Brown --- Wonderfrog Enterprises --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Sergio Sagliocco wrote:
:Is there a way to avoid spamming using SSL and/or certificate X.509?
:
:
:
:
Hello,
I just installed the tcpserver package. I then isssued the
/etc/init.d/qmail stop command. When I grep for qmail from ps I get no
output. Yet when I go to start qmail under tcp server I get the following
error:
> tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c400 -u101 -g100 0 smtp
/usr/local/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
[1] 8963
[1] Exit 111 tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c400
-u101 -g100 0 smtp ...
>
When I run qmail-qread I see that there are 2000 messages in the queue. I
have attempted to send a kill -14 to qmaild in order to run the queue which
takes a seemignly inordinate amount of time. My question is does mail
sitting in the queue cause the above error message and if so what is the
best way to restart qmail with mail sitting in the queue so that I may bind
to port 25 ?
Thanks in advance.
Clifford Thurber
Web Systems Administrator
LiveUniverse.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
565 5th Ave. 29th Fl.
New York, NY 10017
Ph:212 883 6940 (131)
Fax:212 856 9134
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, clifford thurber wrote:
> Hello,
> I just installed the tcpserver package. I then isssued the
> /etc/init.d/qmail stop command. When I grep for qmail from ps I get no
> output. Yet when I go to start qmail under tcp server I get the following
> error:
>
> > tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c400 -u101 -g100 0 smtp
> /usr/local/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
> tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
Something is already using port 25. Either sendmail or another instance
of tcpserver is running.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net
128K ISDN: $24.95/mo or less - 56K Dialup: $17.95/mo or less at Pop4
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
Have you installed checkpassword? Also, the Maildirs have to be
created by hand using maildirmake which has to be run by the user.
Also, make sure qmail delivers to ~/Maildir. Please read carefully
all the README's for the rpms.
Mate
--
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
|
Hi,
Each user at my company has several e-mail
aliases (first.last, first_last, Flast, firstL) with our current sendmail server
that equates to alot of lines in the aliases file.
What is the best way to do this on my new
qmail server? I am worried about the administration time creating all of the
.qmail- files in ~aliases. Would we see a performance hit if I installed
dotforward and run some aliases from the aliases file, and the rest as
.qmail-?
Thanks in advance
|
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:43:36AM -0800, Max wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Each user at my company has several e-mail aliases (first.last, first_last, Flast,
>firstL) with our current sendmail server that equates to alot of lines in the aliases
>file.
>
> What is the best way to do this on my new qmail server? I am worried about the
>administration time creating all of the .qmail- files in ~aliases. Would we see a
>performance hit if I installed dotforward and run some aliases from the aliases file,
>and the rest as .qmail-?
Go for the fastforward package. It's much faster than plain ol' /etc/aliases
under sendmail.
--
http://x42.com/
Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Each user at my company has several e-mail aliases (first.last, first_last,
> Flast, firstL) with our current sendmail server that equates to alot of lines
> in the aliases file.
There's another way...
> What is the best way to do this on my new qmail server? I am worried about
> the administration time creating all of the .qmail- files in ~aliases.
> Would we see a performance hit if I installed dotforward and run some aliases
> from the aliases file, and the rest as .qmail-?
Try using /var/qmail/users/mailnames (documented briefly in the man page
for qmail-pw2u).
Essentially, it's a lot of lines of the format:
sysaccount:mailalias1[:mailalias2][...]
We use it to set up the same types of aliases here. qmail-pw2u takes it
into account when it creates the output which you put into
/var/qmail/users/assign, which is used by qmail-newu to create the cdb file.
Charles
--
----------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
----------------------------------------------------
Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> Qmail's documentation is perfect.
>
> Repeat until you believe.
Exactly -- it could not be more terse and still document everything.
Perfect.
;)
-Matt
--
Matt Brown ---- UNIX Administrator ---- tickets.com
Phone: (714) 327-5571 --- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have started coding an authentication module for courier-imapd to support
vmailmgr style Maildirs. I'd rather not reinvent the wheel though- if
anyone has already implemented this I'd like to hear about it.
Thanks,
-steve
I know the author of vmailmgrd is working on that very thing....and I
believe was close to finishing....due to be released in the next version.
check the vmailmgr mailing list.
Barry Smoke
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Kondik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 5:02 PM
Subject: courier-imapd + vmailmgr
>I have started coding an authentication module for courier-imapd to support
>vmailmgr style Maildirs. I'd rather not reinvent the wheel though- if
>anyone has already implemented this I'd like to hear about it.
>
>Thanks,
>-steve
>
Has any work been done on qmail-imap since 0.02, dated 12 March 1999
at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/imap/ ? I applied the patch (for qmail-1.02) to
qmail-1.03. It applied cleanly, largely because what the patch really
did was create two new .c files and modify the Makefile. It seems
to work, but like the documentation says, that seems to be about it.
Using Netscape, if I tried to read the INBOX., I get the response,
"too many args", which appears to be in the do command (docmd)
function in qmail-imapd.c. Unfortunately, this is the better of the
results I've gotten. I suspect this may be due to the bugs in
Netscape's IMAP client that causes other IMAP daemon's to complain.
If qmail-imap is dead, what other options are there? I've used
Courier IMAP, which supports Maildirs, but it chokes with Netscape
quite often. I installed and have used cyrus imapd, but I cannot
find anything anywhere on how to make it use Maildirs, or even
make it coexist with qmail effectively.
The ideal solution, I think, would be qmail-imapd because it uses
checkpassword, which I've patched for selective relaying, as
well as its native support for maildir. It's also pretty cool that
qmail-imapd implemented as a bunch of perl files. ;)
Thanks,
~Patrick
Mullen, Patrick writes:
> Has any work been done on qmail-imap since 0.02, dated 12 March 1999
> at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/imap/ ? I applied the patch (for qmail-1.02) to
> qmail-1.03. It applied cleanly, largely because what the patch really
> did was create two new .c files and modify the Makefile. It seems
> to work, but like the documentation says, that seems to be about it.
Yup, that's about it.
> If qmail-imap is dead, what other options are there? I've used
> Courier IMAP, which supports Maildirs, but it chokes with Netscape
> quite often.
I believe that fixing Courier IMAP is the best option.
> The ideal solution, I think, would be qmail-imapd because it uses
> checkpassword, which I've patched for selective relaying, as
> well as its native support for maildir. It's also pretty cool that
> qmail-imapd implemented as a bunch of perl files. ;)
I'm glad you like it, but unless you pick up the cross, nobody's
working on it.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > If qmail-imap is dead, what other options are there? I've used
> > Courier IMAP, which supports Maildirs, but it chokes with Netscape
> > quite often.
>
> I believe that fixing Courier IMAP is the best option.
Someone tracked this one down and confirmed it to be a bug in Netscape
Messenger's IMAP client.
--
Sam
>If qmail-imap is dead, what other options are there? I've used
>Courier IMAP, which supports Maildirs, but it chokes with Netscape
>quite often. I installed and have used cyrus imapd, but I cannot
>find anything anywhere on how to make it use Maildirs, or even
>make it coexist with qmail effectively.
Cyrus uses its own mailbox format, period. You won't get it to use
Maildirs. (Of course, unless you feel you truly need direct file access to
the mailbox or must run over NFS, Cyrus format is probably higher
performance)
It will of course exist happily with qmail; it's just a matter of using
the right invocation of 'deliver' in .qmail-default.
-- greg
I have just switched my majordomo list over to a new host. I have found
that when I subscribe a name and address together, e.g.:
"Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
that there are problems sending out the mail. I have been told that the
problem is that the host is using qmail instead of sendmail, and that qmail
does not like to see names. It interprets the whole thing as one address.
1. Is this true?
2. If it is, is there a way around it (besides dropping the names from the
list)?
Thank you very much!
|
Anyone used the rpm instructions on the
courier-imap page and gotten them to work?
All the files look like they install o.k.....but on my RH6.0
system, I disabled the imap line in my inetd.conf file(in order to get rid of
the bind: already in use error) because it looks to me like it uses couriertcpd
to listen on it's own........
the start-up script runs...with the right
messages, but I do a netstat....and there's no port 143 being listened
to...(yes...I'm using netstat -tan for a complete listing.) I do a ps
aux....and there's no imap process running......
Even though the author says there's no need to
post a rpm....it would be nice to have one that's ready to install, and
run....just by changing the config file.
Thanks,
Barry Smoke
|
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Barry Smoke wrote:
> Even though the author says there's no need to post a rpm....it would
> be nice to have one that's ready to install, and run....just by
> changing the config file.
As the instruction say, you build the binary RPM directly from the
tarball.
--
Sam
yes...as I said...it doesn't work right out of the box.
I will say that I was impressed about the rpm building straight from the
tarball.....but it should also work after installation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: courier-imap rpm
>On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Barry Smoke wrote:
>
>> Even though the author says there's no need to post a rpm....it would
>> be nice to have one that's ready to install, and run....just by
>> changing the config file.
>
>As the instruction say, you build the binary RPM directly from the
>tarball.
>
>
>--
>Sam
>
>
>
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Barry Smoke wrote:
> I will say that I was impressed about the rpm building straight from the
> tarball.....but it should also work after installation.
It works for me.
--
Sam
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
using it. It's dafacto standard."
If not on the site, why not send me some examples of sites that uses
qmail?
Best regards
Michael Boman
--
W I Z O F F I C E . C O M P T E L T D - Your Online Wizard
16 Tannery Lane, Crystal Time Building, #06-00, Singapore 347778
Voice : (65) 844 3228 [ext 118] Fax : (65) 842 7228
Pager : (65) 92 93 29 49 ICQ : 5566009
eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.wizoffice.com
Just as an aside, the phrase "everyone else is using it" could also be
considered a downside when taking security into consideration. The more
something is used, the more hackers know about it. Just food for thought
(and bosses love hearing about how secure you've made their system!)
--
·.¸¸.·´¯`·. Glenn R. Crownover
·.¸¸.·´¯`·. Owner/CEO - Investor's Network Cafe
·.¸¸.·´¯`·. http://www.investnetcafe.com/
·.¸¸.·´¯`·. reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Boman wrote:
> Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
> as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
> qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
> using it. It's dafacto standard."
>
> If not on the site, why not send me some examples of sites that uses
> qmail?
>
> Best regards
> Michael Boman
>
> --
> W I Z O F F I C E . C O M P T E L T D - Your Online Wizard
> 16 Tannery Lane, Crystal Time Building, #06-00, Singapore 347778
> Voice : (65) 844 3228 [ext 118] Fax : (65) 842 7228
> Pager : (65) 92 93 29 49 ICQ : 5566009
> eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.wizoffice.com
I believe hotmail does use qmail for their outgoing mail...or so I've read
somewhere.
Jacob Joseph
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Crownover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "qmail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail?
> Just as an aside, the phrase "everyone else is using it" could also be
> considered a downside when taking security into consideration. The more
> something is used, the more hackers know about it. Just food for thought
> (and bosses love hearing about how secure you've made their system!)
>
> --
> ·.¸¸.·´¯`·. Glenn R. Crownover
> ·.¸¸.·´¯`·. Owner/CEO - Investor's Network Cafe
> ·.¸¸.·´¯`·. http://www.investnetcafe.com/
> ·.¸¸.·´¯`·. reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Michael Boman wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses
qmail
> > as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
> > qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
> > using it. It's dafacto standard."
> >
> > If not on the site, why not send me some examples of sites that uses
> > qmail?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael Boman
> >
> > --
> > W I Z O F F I C E . C O M P T E L T D - Your Online Wizard
> > 16 Tannery Lane, Crystal Time Building, #06-00, Singapore 347778
> > Voice : (65) 844 3228 [ext 118] Fax : (65) 842 7228
> > Pager : (65) 92 93 29 49 ICQ : 5566009
> > eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.wizoffice.com
>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
> as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
> qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
> using it. It's dafacto standard."
>
> If not on the site, why not send me some examples of sites that uses
> qmail?
Hotmail (outgoing, as per previous discussion here)
USA.net
Yahoo! mail
Netscape.net webmail (usa.net)
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 06:23:39AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> > Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
> > as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
> > qmail is a great MTA, as most people say: "Use sendmail, everyone else
> > using it. It's dafacto standard."
> >
> > If not on the site, why not send me some examples of sites that uses
> > qmail?
>
Hotmail (outgoing, as per previous discussion here)
USA.net
Yahoo! mail
Netscape.net webmail (usa.net)
listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu - biggest listserv is using qmail since 1996.
onelist.com - biggest free list service availiable.
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
Glenn R. Crownover wrote:
> Just as an aside, the phrase "everyone else is using it" could also be
> considered a downside when taking security into consideration. The more
> something is used, the more hackers know about it.
When do people stop to make such statements? I would like to repeat my
answer in the DNS thread - but I know it was a little bit rude.
Security by obscurity is NO solution to security problems. It keeps people
thinking they are secure when they really aren't.
Widely used open software with a design that has security as its main
focus, that can be reviewed by anybody interested, even with a price for
found security holes is the best base I can think of.
Open source is no guarantee for security. But it helps in getting an
opinion about a product that is based on facts and not marketing crap. If
this software is widely used and analyzed by security experts and hackers
it's a big win. Security problems will be discovered and eliminated faster
than in every other product.
Just food for thought.
Frank
Why is it that the maximum number for concurrent remote connections
is 120? /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote cannot override this
maximum value.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:22:40PM +0800, Benjamin de los Angeles Jr . wrote:
120 is a compile-time upper limit imposed on concurrency for
qmail-lspawn and qmail-rspawn. You can raise it to 255 on some systems.
See the file conf-spawn in the qmail source.
> Why is it that the maximum number for concurrent remote connections
> is 120? /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote cannot override this
> maximum value.
--
See complete headers for more info
Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
the
best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
Thanks
Alok
Alok Bhatt wrote:
>
> Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
> the
> best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
>
> Thanks
> Alok
Well, I use fsav from Data Fellows Corporation,
http://www.DataFellows.com/.
I have to pay for it, but I think thats ok. We use the F-secure in our
MS-WinXX environment as well, and are very satisfied..
--
/hans
Assuming you have some kind of interface between the mail server
and virus scanner (eg Amavis), we currently find NAI and F-Secure
catch the most viruses while giving the least false positives.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alok Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 8:00 AM
Subject: virus scanners
Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
the
best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
Thanks
Alok
____________________________________________________________________________
____
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Star Screening
System
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
________________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Star Screening System
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
Alok Bhatt wrote:
>
> Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
> the
> best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
See http://av-linux.w3.to/ or directly
http://www.ce.is.fh-furtwangen.de/~link/security/av-linux_e.txt for a
list of available products. Well, the best depends. You may have a look
at the anti-virus product test of the Virus Test Center, see
http://agn-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vtc/eng1.htm
HTH
best regards,
Rainer Link
--
Member of Virus Help Munich (www.vhm.haitec.de) | Rainer Link
Member of AMaViS Development Team (amavis.org) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer FAQ "antivirus for Linux" (av-linux.w3.to) | rainer.w3.to
|
Any suggestions on what to set up to view a
threaded mailing list archive on the web. Is there anything out there in
php3? There are several php forum packages that could be adapted....how
easy would this be?
I noticed that ezmlm-web was at 2.0 now....how
good is this?...and does it do the web archive?
What is everyone else using?
I'm just full of questions..........:-)
Thanks,
Barry Smoke
|
Hi,
I've got this problem for few weeks but still got no idea about
that....even I've searched the archive.
This is the qmail 1.03 running on Solaris x86 v2.7. I've tried to use
.qmail to run a vacation program for the users. The .qmail contains the
following 2 lines:
./Maildir/
|preline /usr/bin/vacation -j syssupp
And i've tried to send one message with attachment to that user, it
delivered....but few minutes later, it generate another same message in the
user mail directory....and after few min....it's same....
Not all mails will be duplicated, so I've no idea about why!! I've tried to
stop the vacation program without removing the .vacation.msg file. It's
still happened until I've also remoevd the .vacation.msg file!!
Do anyone of you know why? Of anything I configured wrong?
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40917 Feb 9 16:08 950083717.26268.email
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40917 Feb 9 16:10 950083818.26492.email
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40917 Feb 9 16:11 950083882.26630.email
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40911 Feb 9 16:14 950084083.27111.email
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40917 Feb 9 16:15 950084118.27177.email
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40927 Feb 9 16:15 950084125.27201.email
-rw------- 1 syssupp other 40917 Feb 9 16:19 950084382.27692.email
Please help...some users got more than 1000 message after their "nice
holidays"!!
Thanks a lot.
rdgs,
Ewen Fung
Hi,
I'm trying to find an IMAP server for qmail that is capable of Maildir
access and using vchkpw.
What does everyone recommend.
Cheers,
Del.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 10:26:05AM +0000, Derek Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find an IMAP server for qmail that is capable of Maildir
> access and using vchkpw.
>
> What does everyone recommend.
Where did you find vchkpw?
- http://www.inter7.com/vchkpw/
Where do you find a good IMAP-server
- http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
