On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 06:48:50PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > W. Richard Stevens did that benchmark in _Advanced Unix Programming_ quite > a while back; as I recall, the difference between single-character writes > and buffered writes in his data was an order of magnitude or two. of course. lrz, buffered file write: (fwrite) Bytes received: 335868/ 335868 BPS:3251764 Bytes received: 346199/ 346199 BPS:2601924 lrz, buffered file write: (putc) Bytes received: 336079/ 336079 BPS:2837811 Bytes received: 346199/ 346199 BPS:2247884 lrz, unbuffered file write: (write, single bytes) Bytes received: 335936/ 335936 BPS:87863 Bytes received: 346199/ 346199 BPS:87847 Using unbuffered I/O where one can use buffered I/O wastes performance, due to context switch slowness. Regards, Uwe
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat markd
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat markd
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Sam
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Paul Jarc
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Sam
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Paul Jarc
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat markd
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Paul Jarc
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Russ Allbery
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Len Budney
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Uwe Ohse
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Len Budney
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Paul Jarc
- Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat Len Budney
- Re: Safecat challenge Len Budney
- RE: Safecat challenge James Park
- RE: Safecat challenge Paul Farber
- Time zones? Qué? Stephen Bosch
- Re: Time zones? Qué? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Maildir and procmail Mikko Hänninen
- Re: Maildir and procmail Manfred Bartz