qmail Digest 29 Feb 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 926
Topics (messages 37829 through 37884):
Re: Anyone know how to monitor this?
37829 by: Tracy R Reed
37830 by: Magnus Bodin
Is my server being used as a SPAM relay?
37831 by: Albert Hopkins
37832 by: Petr Novotny
37863 by: Albert Hopkins
Re: qmqp and local delivery
37833 by: Fred Lindberg
Re: concurrencyremote setting
37834 by: Dave Sill
Connected_to_x.x.x.x_but_connection_died
37835 by: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: qmail-inject and attchments
37836 by: markd.bushwire.net
37837 by: Russ Allbery
37838 by: Russell Nelson
37841 by: Russ Allbery
where to get cyclog
37839 by: Robert Sander
37840 by: Dave Sill
Re: Encryption and t-shirts
37842 by: Dave Sill
37843 by: Soffen, Matthew
37846 by: Vern Hart
37849 by: Kai MacTane
37851 by: Dave Sill
37852 by: John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
37853 by: Vern Hart
37854 by: Vern Hart
37858 by: Rogerio Brito
37859 by: Rogerio Brito
37860 by: Lars Uffmann
37864 by: Vern Hart
37865 by: Adrian Urquhart
37866 by: Vern Hart
37867 by: Ted Deppner
37868 by: Vern Hart
37874 by: Tom Reinertson
37875 by: Vern Hart
37877 by: Edward S. Marshall
Slow delivery (part 2)
37844 by: Matthew Bloch
37847 by: richard.illuin.org
37850 by: Matthew Bloch
Re: Problem with ~/alias
37845 by: Daniel Carlos
Question with concurrencyremote
37848 by: chChen
Error in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current
37855 by: Robert Holder
37856 by: markd.bushwire.net
37857 by: Robert Holder
37861 by: markd.bushwire.net
Re: qmail-ifc-len-patch (ipme.c)
37862 by: Jos Backus
Path
37869 by: Lee Trotter
Re: POP Toaster
37870 by: Paul Gregg
can't stop qmail (supervise-scripts)
37871 by: Smoerk
37872 by: Chris Johnson
POP3 Slowdown solved (I think)
37873 by: Jose de Leon
how can I unsubscribe
37876 by: tao tao
37882 by: Ruben van der Leij
How to impliment qmail-pop3d?
37878 by: Eric Lalonde
Sender domain "invalid"
37879 by: Stein Ma
37880 by: Magnus Bodin
37881 by: Anand Buddhdev
maildirserial help
37883 by: Stein Ma
Mail delivered instead of bounce
37884 by: Dimitri SZAJMAN
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 04:06:22PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> I want MRTG to monitor my mail traffic such like:
Get qmail-mrtg. I don't have a url but you should be able to find it with a
little searching.
--
Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 03:11:20AM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 04:06:22PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> > I want MRTG to monitor my mail traffic such like:
>
> Get qmail-mrtg. I don't have a url but you should be able to find it with a
> little searching.
I haven't found any other than Russells directory, so I packeted one version
that did traffic and queue:
http://x42.com/qmail/mrtg/
Please let me know if there is any further additions that could be made
here.
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
I can't see how/why it is happening, but it appears that our qmail server
is relaying email from outside senders to outside recipients (I thought
qmail by default doesn't do this). My /var/qmail/control/locals and
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts only have *.dynacare.com addresses in
them. However qmail appears to be delivering to outside addresses even
though the source address is outside as well.
I've included a bounced bounce. The original caller has an outside
address.
--
Albert Hopkins
Dynacare, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 25 Feb 2000 23:48:11 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.dynacare.com.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Connected to 38.163.208.152 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 501 bogus mail from
--- Below this line is the original bounce.
Return-Path: <>
Received: (qmail 9314 invoked for bounce); 25 Feb 2000 23:48:09 -0000
Date: 25 Feb 2000 23:48:09 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.dynacare.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
216.32.243.136 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken:user account inactive
Giving up on 216.32.243.136.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
204.68.24.19 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User has cancelled account
Giving up on 204.68.24.19.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
128.11.68.146 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 qdirdel.1 error 100:This user does not have a yahoo.com account
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.240.198.91 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 209.240.198.91.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.240.198.91 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 209.240.198.91.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
192.25.158.11 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 192.25.158.11.
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 9045 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2000 23:46:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (205.178.138.2)
by 172.31.128.10 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2000 23:46:57 -0000
X-See-Also: 08CFF0A5B
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:49:55
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service [26.4.456.1] (Solaris; Sparc2)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MessageID: <vmh5f6b36abwdf1.250220001849@localhost>
X-Other-References: 0756BABAB
X-Accept-Language: en
Subject: Private Cyber Club Pays You By the Minute!
Sensitivity: Personal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-References: 034941195, 09CA5AFED
References: 00016DC50
Hi,
I just want you to take a quick look at this TRULY
PHENOMENAL one-of-a-kind, PRIVATE OFFSHORE Wealth
Building Program.
It's a PRIVATE By-Invitation-Only OFFSHORE CLUB,
where many of us are earning $500 to $3,500 per DAY!
We get paid BY-THE-MINUTE directly into our Private
Offshore Bank Accounts - 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week
AS PEOPLE JOIN! We are talking about some serious
money here. You'll want to further investigate this
opportunity.
People are JOINING US FAST and you earn $500 EACH.
And that's just from ONE Income Stream - there are
3 MORE! Many are making $80,000 to $100,000 in just
10 to 12 weeks. Yes - it is REALLY TRUE!
Some people are already making 5 figures PER WEEK
from ONE of the other Income Streams that requires
absolutely NO SPONSORING! That's right - this great
program works for everyone. Sales ability is not
required.
GREAT NEWS FOR INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURS
This AMAZING 100% Private Offshore Wealth Building
Program WORKS for people living IN EVERY country in
the WORLD - USA, Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan,
Brazil, Italy, England, Norway, Germany, France.
EVERY COUNTRY - now 80 countries in just 20 weeks.
MEMBERS PRIVILEDGES INCLUDE:
+ Legal Private Offshore Class 'A' Bank Account.
+ Private International Gold MasterCard Credit Card.
NO daily Cash Limit!!!
+ Private Encrypted Banking Software Program. Allows
you to manage your Offshore account from anywhere in
the world at anytime.
+ Private Secure Encrypted Email Account.
+ Access to International Investment Opportunities.
(PHENOMENAL High Yield)
+ Receive your own complete marketing web site when
you join. People can sign up on-line on it from
around the world 24 hours a day 7 days a week.
This is a LEGAL and LEGITIMATE business opportunity,
that WILL MAKE YOU MORE MONEY than you've ever made
in your life !! Some Members have retired in just
120 days.
ARE YOU INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ?
If you like what you've read so far, and want to
hear about real people who are making more money
than they have ever made before - then I'll send
instructions to my website that has two great
Opportunity Overview Real Audio messages on it!
You can listen for free on your computer, it will
blow you away. If you still want more information,
you can participate in a one of the many free live
interactive daily conference calls, which are open
to any questions you may have.
This program is working better than any other I
have been in - and it's working for those people
who have not been successful at other programs.
You join just once, but the cash keeps rolling in!
I love this program :-)
TO LEARN HOW YOU CAN BECOME A MEMBER ....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SEND an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And write "MORE INFO" in the Subject.
Please DO NOT just HIT the REPLY button to this email.
You WON'T get your "INFO" IF YOU DO THAT :-(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-------------------------------------------------------
If you DON'T want to receive any email we will honor
that. Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Feb 00, at 8:32, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> I can't see how/why it is happening, but it appears that our qmail
> server is relaying email from outside senders to outside recipients (I
> thought qmail by default doesn't do this). My
> /var/qmail/control/locals and /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts only have
> *.dynacare.com addresses in them. However qmail appears to be
> delivering to outside addresses even though the source address is
> outside as well.
A few possibilities:
1. Misspelled name of "rcpthosts" file
2. RELAYCLIENT variable set to empty string system-wide
3. RELAYCLIENT variable set to empty due to error in tcpserver
database or inetd wrappers syntax
4. Hacked qmail installation
5. You are a "smart host" for an open relay somewhere inside your
network (doesn't look like that from the headers though)
6. A local user (or user on local network) does the spamming.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
iQA/AwUBOLp6XVMwP8g7qbw/EQLqhQCg8HmSFqmvhdHtHFbgESB1mUn8LnUAoNa5
X72B3fTf81U1Ojg0dk8vXxKq
=/hTt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
[Tom Waits]
Figured out that the last configuration line for tcpserver was
allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Thanks for all those who gave suggestions.
--
Albert Hopkins
Dynacare, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:18:41 -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
>via QMQP. As I understand it my qmail-qmqpc uploads a copy of the message and
>a list of recipients to the qmqpd machine and that machine does the remote
>deliveries. This should save me quite a bit of bandwidth. However, I still
ezmlm-idx-0.40 has built-in support for QMQP. It sends posts via
qmail-qmqpc and administrative mail via qmail-queue. No need for extra
installations.
If your link is slow, increase the read timeout in qmail-qmqpc.
Otherwise, you sometimes get duplications because it doesn't hand
around long enough to get the final "OK" from the server and thus
assumes the delivery has failed. 5 min seems to work fine
trans-ISDN+trans-continentally.
This also keeps you lists responsive to sub/unsub/archive/mod.
-Sincerely, Fred
(Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)
"DeChavez , Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just would like to find out the highest value anyone has set
>concurrencyremote conf file?
I've got it at 500 on my list server.
>Any impact on system performance as it gets higher?
Yeah, it goes down. :-)
-Dave
[I'm not subscribed to the list, so I would appreciate a copy of replies.]
I have a qmail 1.01 host which previously sent mail by UUCP. Now, it sends
everything to a smart host with SMTP. Sometimes, it works and sometimes, *all*
the messages trigger a:
Feb 28 15:39:43 cachin qmail: 951748783.154132 delivery 6: deferral:
Connected_to_x.x.x.x_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!/
(IP address hidden because it is a RFC 1918, anyway).
Searching the archives of the mailing list, I find very often this problem but
no solution.
Telnetting to the smart host (which uses Sendmail 8.9.3 and which is not under
my control) and running SMTP commands by hand works fine.
My machine is a RedHat 5 (yes, it's old, I know). stracing qmail-remote shows:
bortz@cachin$ sudo strace -p 26038
oldselect(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {996, 940000}) = 0 (Timeout)
shutdown(3, 0 /* receive */) = 0
oldselect(4, NULL, [3], NULL, {1200, 0}) = 1 (out [3], left {1200, 0})
write(3, "QUIT\r\n", 6) = 6
oldselect(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {1200, 0})
read(3, "", 128) = 0
write(1, "ZConnected to x.x.x.x but "..., 70) = 70
_exit(0) = ?
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 11:50:25AM +0200, TAG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
> qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
> respect??
You need to use a full user-agent. qmail-inject is little more than what
it's name implies. Namely an injector or mail, not a composer of mail.
For a command line program that composes a mail with attachments, you
could do worse than mutt.
Regards.
TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
> qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
> respect??
No. qmail-inject doesn't know enough about the message structure to be
able to do that. But there are certainly packages that can do this; I
believe Mutt is one of them.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Russ Allbery writes:
> TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
> > qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
> > respect??
>
> No. qmail-inject doesn't know enough about the message structure to be
> able to do that. But there are certainly packages that can do this; I
> believe Mutt is one of them.
I think he's looking for /var/qmail/bin/mailsubj. It doesn't "attach
files" unless you consider the following an attachment method :)
uuencode "file-you-wanted" | \
mailsubj "this is the file you wanted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
>>> qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in
>>> this respect??
>> No. qmail-inject doesn't know enough about the message structure to be
>> able to do that. But there are certainly packages that can do this; I
>> believe Mutt is one of them.
> I think he's looking for /var/qmail/bin/mailsubj. It doesn't "attach
> files" unless you consider the following an attachment method :)
> uuencode "file-you-wanted" | \
> mailsubj "this is the file you wanted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Given that he wants to attach a file, I believe he's looking for Mutt,
which can do real file attachments from the command line IIRC.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Hi!
My question is now, where do I get cyclog from? I just downloaded
daemontools-0.61 (all my sources state that it is included there), but after
compiling nothing looks like an executable named cyclog...
Greetings
--
Robert Sander www.gurubert.de
Robert Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My question is now, where do I get cyclog from? I just downloaded
>daemontools-0.61 (all my sources state that it is included there), but after
>compiling nothing looks like an executable named cyclog...
Cyclog has been replaced by multilog in daemontools 0.61. Note that
0.61 is not a drop-in replacement for 0.53. If you have scripts or
instructions based on 0.53, they won't work for 0.61.
-Dave
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I
>think we need some t-shirts printed. Let's see:
>
> "I'm with djb"
>
>or maybe
>
> "Qmail is Qool"
>
>or
>
> "cr.yp.to"
>
>Hmm. Maybe,
>
> "UTC for me"
>
>Or how about
>
> Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
> Back: "Send mail with qmail"
>
>or
>
> "cdb. cdb run. run, cdb, run."
>
>Help me out here, guys.
Here are a couple of djb's old .sig lines:
Sick of sendmail? Don't get mad; get qmail.
Secure, reliable, efficient. Pick three.
Other djbisms like "Reliability means never having to say you're
sorry", "Profile, don't speculate", and Len Budney's .sig quotes are
possibilities, too.
I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
but I've been too busy to actually do it.
I'll buy at least one if:
1) I like the design[1],
2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.
-Dave
[1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
stop me from buying one. :-)
[2] Depends on quality of shirt, number of colors/sides printed, etc.,
but $25 delivered is generous, and more than many will spend on a
t-shirt.
[3] I'm not obese (6', 230 lbs), but I have a long torso.
Gee.. I thought I was bad wearing a 2x ( but I am 6', 280ish lbs with a 56"
chest..)
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Sill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 1:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Encryption and t-shirts
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I
> >think we need some t-shirts printed. Let's see:
> >
> > "I'm with djb"
> >
> >or maybe
> >
> > "Qmail is Qool"
> >
> >or
> >
> > "cr.yp.to"
> >
> >Hmm. Maybe,
> >
> > "UTC for me"
> >
> >Or how about
> >
> > Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
> > Back: "Send mail with qmail"
> >
> >or
> >
> > "cdb. cdb run. run, cdb, run."
> >
> >Help me out here, guys.
>
> Here are a couple of djb's old .sig lines:
>
> Sick of sendmail? Don't get mad; get qmail.
> Secure, reliable, efficient. Pick three.
>
> Other djbisms like "Reliability means never having to say you're
> sorry", "Profile, don't speculate", and Len Budney's .sig quotes are
> possibilities, too.
>
> I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
> but I've been too busy to actually do it.
>
> I'll buy at least one if:
>
> 1) I like the design[1],
> 2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
> 3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.
>
> -Dave
>
> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
> stop me from buying one. :-)
> [2] Depends on quality of shirt, number of colors/sides printed, etc.,
> but $25 delivered is generous, and more than many will spend on a
> t-shirt.
> [3] I'm not obese (6', 230 lbs), but I have a long torso.
Today, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
> but I've been too busy to actually do it.
There are a lot of good ideas here!
Usually when I'm asked to make a qmail shirt, ideas are few and far
between.
> I'll buy at least one if:
>
> 1) I like the design[1],
What about this design: http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
within a week.
> 2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
Should cost $17.50 plus shipping.
> 3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.
XXL is $2 extra (XXXL is $3 extra).
> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
> stop me from buying one. :-)
I could easily give two (or more!) options. Do you have a large,
clean version of your dolphon logo?
Cheers,
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
At 12:13 PM 2/28/2000 -0700, Vern Hart wrote or quoted:
>
>What about this design: http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
>If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
>within a week.
My US$.02 on this design:
* I prefer black t-shirts; I pretty much only wear white t-shirts on
laundry day.
* People often wear t-shirts underneath sweatshirts, jackets, or
other things that cover the back but not the front. Putting the
sendmail logo on the front and the qmail logo on the back can
easily defeat the purpose of this shirt.
* I don't know what the legal considerations are in using the
sendmail logo without permission; since they're now "Sendmail,
Inc.", they may well have trademarked that logo.
I suggest putting both sentences on the front, with just the qmail logo.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kai MacTane
System Administrator
Online Partners.com, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From the Jargon File: (v4.0.0, 25 Jul 1996)
house wizard /n./
A hacker occupying a technical-specialist, R&D, or systems position
at a commercial shop. A really effective house wizard can have influ-
ence out of all proportion to his/her ostensible rank and still not
have to wear a suit.
Vern Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There are a lot of good ideas here!
>Usually when I'm asked to make a qmail shirt, ideas are few and far
>between.
Well, this is qmail HQ. :-)
>What about this design: http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
>If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
>within a week.
Kai's probably right about the sendmail logo. Maybe a (send)whale
would be better. :-)
>I could easily give two (or more!) options. Do you have a large,
>clean version of your dolphon logo?
When I get home, I'll send you the best I've got.
-Dave
I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
good.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
>Today, Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
>> but I've been too busy to actually do it.
>
>There are a lot of good ideas here!
>Usually when I'm asked to make a qmail shirt, ideas are few and far
>between.
>
>> I'll buy at least one if:
>>
>> 1) I like the design[1],
>
>What about this design: http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
>If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
>within a week.
>
>> 2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
>
>Should cost $17.50 plus shipping.
>
>> 3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.
>
>XXL is $2 extra (XXXL is $3 extra).
>
>> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
>> stop me from buying one. :-)
>
>I could easily give two (or more!) options. Do you have a large,
>clean version of your dolphon logo?
>
>Cheers,
>Vern
>--
>\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
> \ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> \_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
>
>
>
_ __ _____ __ _________
______________ /_______ ___ ____ /______ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/ \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[---------------------------------------------[system info]-----------]
1:15pm up 34 days, 21:12, 4 users, load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.12
Today, Kai MacTane wrote:
>
> My US$.02 on this design:
>
> * I prefer black t-shirts; I pretty much only wear white t-shirts on
> laundry day.
I prefer black as well, but I can do gray, white, and tan much
quicker and cheaper in one-off runs. If enough of us decide we want
black, we can take orders, have them printed and then distributed.
This is easy enough but it will take longer and the price will
depend on how many we make.
> * People often wear t-shirts underneath sweatshirts, jackets, or
> other things that cover the back but not the front. Putting the
> sendmail logo on the front and the qmail logo on the back can
> easily defeat the purpose of this shirt.
I don't think I own a tshirt that doesn't have a logo on the front.
Oh, you probably mean the most prominent logo is the sendmail one...
Well, we could switch them and/or put all the words on the back with
a small qmail logo on the front...
> * I don't know what the legal considerations are in using the
> sendmail logo without permission; since they're now "Sendmail,
> Inc.", they may well have trademarked that logo.
Actually, it's not the sendmail logo. To avoid copying it too
closely I drew it from memory and if you ask me, I only barely
matched the basic design. http://www.sendmail.org/gif/batorng.gif
Also, sendmail, inc has a different logo.
http://www2.sendmail.com/img/logo.gif
But if people don't like it, we can easily get rid of it.
Cheers,
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
Today, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>
> I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
> have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
> good.
I can do one or two more "taglines". What are people's top "second"
choices?
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
On Feb 28 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
> What about this design: http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
> If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
> within a week.
I think that I like it. But the dolphin would be nicer, IMVHO,
and more consistent also with sendmail's bat (if there aren't
any legal problems with that, as mentioned in other messages).
BTW, I'd vote for the front/back design (here where I live is
hot and I usually don't wear anything over t-shirts).
> > 2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
>
> Should cost $17.50 plus shipping.
How much would it be for shipping to Brazil?
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/opeth/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Feb 28 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
> stop me from buying one. :-)
You did that dolphin? Wow... It's cute...
> [2] Depends on quality of shirt, number of colors/sides printed,
> etc., but $25 delivered is generous, and more than many will spend
> on a t-shirt.
Well, I'd love to have one... Please if anybody makes one,
please do think about the poor souls of other countries that
will have to pay for the international money order and also
for the expensive overseas shipping rates... :-(
> [3] I'm not obese (6', 230 lbs), but I have a long torso.
That's also a problem. I don't know what size I'd use in the
US standards... :-)
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/opeth/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:22:38PM -0700, Vern Hart wrote:
> Today, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> >
> > I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
> > have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
> > good.
>
> I can do one or two more "taglines". What are people's top "second"
> choices?
I would like
front: '# chmod 0 /usr/lib/sendmail' + qmail logo
back: a cool djb .signature
Lars
Today, Rogerio Brito wrote:
>
> How much would it be for shipping to Brazil?
Looks like international shipping would be:
4-6 weeks (USPS Surface) $3 plus $2 per item.
7-10 days (USPS Air) $6 plus $3 per item.
3 days (USPS Express) $25 plus $3 per item.
Unless you want a black shirt, then I'd have to figure out what
shipping would be on an individual basis.
Cheers,
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
Ok, I'll have a couple.
Can I put in an official order?
Is there to be a choice of colour and front/back logos?
Adrian
Vern Hart wrote:
>
> Today, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> >
> > How much would it be for shipping to Brazil?
>
> Looks like international shipping would be:
>
> 4-6 weeks (USPS Surface) $3 plus $2 per item.
> 7-10 days (USPS Air) $6 plus $3 per item.
> 3 days (USPS Express) $25 plus $3 per item.
>
> Unless you want a black shirt, then I'd have to figure out what
> shipping would be on an individual basis.
>
> Cheers,
> Vern
> --
> \ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
> \ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> \_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
Today, Rogerio Brito wrote:
>
> Well, I'd love to have one... Please if anybody makes one,
> please do think about the poor souls of other countries that
> will have to pay for the international money order and also
> for the expensive overseas shipping rates... :-(
The online service I will use accepts credit cards (via SSL or
telephone) so foreigners shouldn't have any problems.
> That's also a problem. I don't know what size I'd use in the
> US standards... :-)
If you measure your chest with a tape measure (under your arms,
around the widest part) I think the conventional sizes are as
follows:
Size Inches
Small 34-36
Medium 38-40
Large 42-44
XLarge 46-48
XXLarge 50-52
XXXLarge 54-56
Most people like to wear tshirts loose and so choose the next larger
size.
Cheers,
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Lars Uffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:22:38PM -0700, Vern Hart wrote:
> > Today, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
> > > have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
> > > good.
> >
> > I can do one or two more "taglines". What are people's top "second"
> > choices?
>
> I would like
>
> front: '# chmod 0 /usr/lib/sendmail' + qmail logo
> back: a cool djb .signature
I'd personally like something showing the package manager...
'pkg_mgr --remove-pkg sendmail'
chmod 0 while quick to be recognized by unix admins doesn't represent the
finality that --remove-pkg imparts.
(I'm a linux background, so I'm trying not to suggest rpm or dpkg, and I don't
know what other unices use for pkg management... adjust as necessary).
--
Ted Deppner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.psyber.com
Today, Adrian Urquhart wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll have a couple.
>
> Can I put in an official order?
I'll let everyone know when orders will be possible and the URL for
ordering.
> Is there to be a choice of colour and front/back logos?
I will take one or two other slogans and make them available with
either logo. The shirt color choices will only be ash (gray),
white, and natural (tan). Of the three choices, I like the natural
best. You will make the choices at the time of ordering.
I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan. One with the
Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows
logo on the back (big). The second variation would be the same with
the dolphin logo substituted. Should I be bothered with making a
variation with different logos on the front versus the back?
Cheers,
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
> I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan. One with the
> Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows
> logo on the back (big). The second variation would be the same with
> the dolphin logo substituted. Should I be bothered with making a
> variation with different logos on the front versus the back?
>
Personally, I wouldn't mix logos -- I like the styles you've listed. I do have
one suggestion, though. I would prefer to pay a little more and get a really
high quality, heavy t-shirt. I can't stand light weight, flimsy,
see-thru t-shirts.
Thanks for all your work on putting this together.
Tom
Today, Tom Reinertson wrote:
>
> Personally, I wouldn't mix logos -- I like the styles you've
> listed. I do have one suggestion, though. I would prefer to pay
> a little more and get a really high quality, heavy t-shirt. I
> can't stand light weight, flimsy, see-thru t-shirts.
I agree. The basic shirt is a Haynes Beefy-T, Heavyweight.
The sweatshirt option is a Jerzees 50/50 7.5 oz fleece.
The sweatshirt costs about $5 more.
If you want a more heavyweight tshirt, you could get a Henley (tshirt
with three buttons) which is made by Cotton Deluxe and is a nice 7
ounces. But the Henley costs about $10 more.
Cheers,
Vern
--
\ \ / __| _ \ \ | Vern Hart
\ \ / _| / . | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\_/ ___|_|_\_|\_|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
> I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan. One with the
> Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows
> logo on the back (big). The second variation would be the same with
> the dolphin logo substituted. Should I be bothered with making a
> variation with different logos on the front versus the back?
The dolphin would be great, especially if you could contrast it with a
forlorn-looking bat...*grin* Maybe:
"Don't queue mail with Sendmail..." <BAT>
<DOLPHIN> "Send mail with QMail!"
or some such. But then again, I have no taste, so take this with a grain
of salt.
I'll also second the request for higher-quality material. Heavy-weight
shirt or sweatshirt is definitely what I'd prefer, personally...
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. ]
I've managed to narrow down my earlier problem, though I'm still confused.
To reiterate, whenever I qmail-inject anything into the mail queue, it
sits in /var/qmail/control/mess/... without any control files present.
Then maybe 1-2 hours later it is delivered (the log concurs with this).
Running /etc/init.d/qmail restart makes all the mail go off immediately,
but sending an ALRM signal to qmail-send doesn't.
I've still no idea, anyone else care to help?
--
Matthew ( http://www.soup-kitchen.demon.co.uk/ )
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Matthew Bloch wrote:
> I've managed to narrow down my earlier problem, though I'm still confused.
>
> To reiterate, whenever I qmail-inject anything into the mail queue, it
> sits in /var/qmail/control/mess/... without any control files present.
> Then maybe 1-2 hours later it is delivered (the log concurs with this).
> Running /etc/init.d/qmail restart makes all the mail go off immediately,
> but sending an ALRM signal to qmail-send doesn't.
what are the permissions, etc in /var/qmail/queue/lock:
- -rw------- 1 qmails qmail 0 Jul 21 1999 sendmutex
- -rw-r--r-- 1 qmailr qmail 1024 Feb 16 22:52 tcpto
prw--w--w- 1 qmails qmail 0 Feb 28 19:03 trigger
^^^^^^^^^^ very important, if your permisions do not match this then
qmail-send won't get triggered properly when new mail is added to the
queue
RjL
==================================================================
You know that. I know that. But when || Austin, Texas
you talk to a monkey you have to || Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grunt and wave your arms -ck ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOLrIE56bDk8vHTn1AQFLDQP+JXy4teedjJ4obmrrxMPJ+odXwA8rZxDU
X/vr8q/1qXKDF0Uz95Mcd2gfqE9v335nrIDuVeYiRO2+bAHMM/9D11ZYOHnf8t0h
+j7Qe5YW+fHOPwN36M3AUBgVhOUIOMqxKynB/7m7UDwnd3TDjRa2QPPssd2T6XnN
LLKxFTeq6ug=
=Nhfs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Then maybe 1-2 hours later it is delivered (the log concurs with this).
> > Running /etc/init.d/qmail restart makes all the mail go off immediately,
> > but sending an ALRM signal to qmail-send doesn't.
>
> what are the permissions, etc in /var/qmail/queue/lock:
> - -rw------- 1 qmails qmail 0 Jul 21 1999 sendmutex
> - -rw-r--r-- 1 qmailr qmail 1024 Feb 16 22:52 tcpto
> prw--w--w- 1 qmails qmail 0 Feb 28 19:03 trigger
> ^^^^^^^^^^ very important, if your permisions do not match this then
> qmail-send won't get triggered properly when new mail is added to the
> queue
Hurrah! This sorts it nicely, thankyou. The permissions were set to 600
rather than 622; change 'em and it works nicely. Do you have any idea how
the permissions might have been set wrong in the first place? It worked
fine when I'd installed the Debian package, then after some fiddling with
fetchmail I got this weird delay. Anyhow, it's not important, it'd just
be nice to know.
thanks very much,
--
Matthew ( http://www.soup-kitchen.demon.co.uk/ )
Hi,
I correct the error.... now it's functioning ok!!!
the function getpwnam(auto_usera) was failing.
Thank's everybody!
Is there a ezmlm support for Mysql working on FreeBSD???
I find a patch for linux RedHat, but I need for FreeBSD.
Somebody know where I can to download it ???
Daniel Carlos
www.atarde.com.br
Bahia, Brazil
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> On Feb 24 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
> > The "Unable to find alias user!" message means getpwent("alias")
> > failed, which means it's either not there, or the process checking
> > couldn't access the file.
>
> It might also help to see the output of qmail-showctl (it
> shows what it thinks is the alias uid).
>
>
> []s, Roger...
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
> Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/opeth/
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
hi all
i just install qmail-1.03 on FreeBSD-3.3RELEASE.
and my problem is ,enev i put the number(120) in
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote
and i use qmail-showctl. i can see the number of concurrencyremote is 120
but my qmail-send didn;t fork so much children to send mail.
sometime many (60~80) sometime very low(1~10) ...
my server lording is low(about 1~2), and max file discriptor is 8192
and retome server is ok.
I want to make it to delivery the mail out af Max speed
could you tell me what should i do.thx.
chChen
Can someone help me out here? /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current is full of this:
@4000000038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
for 501
@4000000038bad9c50d89724c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
for 501
@4000000038bad9c612ecb03c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
for 501
and qmail is queuing messages, but it won't deliver them and they never
leave the queue (as reported by qmail-qstat and qmail-qread). here are the
relevant entries for my /etc/group file:
[root@mail smtpd]# grep 50 /etc/group
nofiles:x:501:
qmail:x:502:
...so... my guess is that my tcprules are hosed?
any help would be greatly appreciated.
robert holder
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:27:35PM -0700, Robert Holder wrote:
> Can someone help me out here? /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current is full of this:
>
> @4000000038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
> for 501
> @4000000038bad9c50d89724c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
> for 501
> @4000000038bad9c612ecb03c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
> for 501
>
> and qmail is queuing messages, but it won't deliver them and they never
> leave the queue (as reported by qmail-qstat and qmail-qread). here are the
> relevant entries for my /etc/group file:
>
> [root@mail smtpd]# grep 50 /etc/group
> nofiles:x:501:
> qmail:x:502:
>
> ...so... my guess is that my tcprules are hosed?
My guess is that the IP address you've given tcpserver is wrong or you've
given it a hostname that it cannot resolve. How is tcpserver started and
what's on the command line?
Regards.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:27:35PM -0700, Robert Holder wrote:
> > Can someone help me out here? /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current is full of
this:
> >
> > @4000000038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
address for 501
> > @4000000038bad9c50d89724c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
address for 501
> > @4000000038bad9c612ecb03c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
address for 501
> >
> > and qmail is queuing messages, but it won't deliver them and they never
> > leave the queue (as reported by qmail-qstat and qmail-qread). here are
the
> > relevant entries for my /etc/group file:
> >
> > [root@mail smtpd]# grep 50 /etc/group
> > nofiles:x:501:
> > qmail:x:502:
> >
> > ...so... my guess is that my tcprules are hosed?
>
> My guess is that the IP address you've given tcpserver is wrong or you've
> given it a hostname that it cannot resolve. How is tcpserver started and
> what's on the command line?
>
>
> Regards.
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run contains:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-u $QMAILUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
thank you very much for the help mark! i set qmail up according to Sill's
"Life with qmail", and now am wondering about the "-p" option to tcpserver.
i am going to look at these env variables and try to figure out what i've
done wrong, but if it's obvious to you, please let me know. thanks again
for the help!
Robert Holder
Lakewood, Colorado
> > > @4000000038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
> address for 501
> > My guess is that the IP address you've given tcpserver is wrong or you've
> > given it a hostname that it cannot resolve. How is tcpserver started and
> > what's on the command line?
> >
> >
> > Regards.
>
> /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run contains:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
> NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000000 \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
> -u $QMAILUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
>
> thank you very much for the help mark! i set qmail up according to Sill's
> "Life with qmail", and now am wondering about the "-p" option to tcpserver.
> i am going to look at these env variables and try to figure out what i've
> done wrong, but if it's obvious to you, please let me know. thanks again
> for the help!
Yep. What's 501 in /etc/passwd and /etc/group?
My guess is that $NOFILESGID has multiple values in it. I don't know why
that would be. Are you running on Linux or some other OS? The id command
varies considerably amongst OSes.
Regards.
This was a kernel bug indeed. The following commit fixes it; no patches to the
qmail port are needed.
guido 2000/02/28 11:30:27 PST
Modified files:
sys/net if.c
Log:
This fixes a problem where the SIOCGIFCONF ioctl goes wrong. This
is triggered when qmail is used with INET6 enabled. The bug
manifests itself in that the space variable can become negative
and that in the comparison in the guards of the 2 loops, this was
not noticed because sizeof() returns an unsigned and thus the signed
variable gets promoted to unsigned. I decided not to make space
unsigned because I think we should guard against this from happening.
Thus panic() in case space becomes negative.
Approved by: jkh
Revision Changes Path
1.85 +10 -2 src/sys/net/if.c
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having to say you're sorry."
_/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
_/ _/ _/ _/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
|
Ok new qmail/linux user here so please for my lack of
knowledge here, and you'll probley be hearing lots more from me.
After installing qmail, the /sbin directoy was removed
from the path or I suspect the path is acutally being over written. This
only occures when I logon though telnet, if I logon though the console it's
fine. Here is the path from a telnet login.
bash:
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/lee/bin: No such file or
directory
Also quick question what does the No such file or directory
mean? I found that happens if I have more then 1 directory in the
path.
Thanks for any help.
Lee Trotter
|
Stephen Remillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I just finished installing qmail on my Linux box. I would like to replace
> our NT mail server with qmail running on Linux. There are no local users on
> this Linux box so everyone will get their e-mail using POP3.
> I have a few beginner's questions for you.
> I am reading the FAQ on how to setup a "POP Toaster" and I am a little
> confused.
> Could someone explain to me the purpose of the checkpassword utility.
> Is it to maintain the list of authorized people without creating user
> account on Linux? Can I do without it?
> Also is there a more detailed document on how to setup qmail-pop3d.
In short Qmail is completely modular. The checkpassword you choose is entirely
dependent on which method of authentication you wish to use:
/etc/password
plaintext password file (other than /etc/passwd)
LDAP
cdb password file
Mysql Database
Radius
etc
etc
In setting up "qmail-pop3d" you need to understand that qmail-pop3d provides
nothing more than the POP3 functions to operate on a users Maildir - it does
not collect useranem/password or arrange the authentication of the user.
Qmail operates as a sequence of programs doing their thing then running the
next program in the chain, e.g. you could setup the following scenario:
Using Daemontools, and the UCSPI packages you may wish to launch the
qmail-pop* system from tcpserver (which listens on port 110), further you
may wish to run tcpserver under a supervisory process, so the execution
"string" would be something like:
echo "Starting POP3 daemon."
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -lmail.mydom.net -t2 -u 888 -g 888 0 110 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.mydom.net \
/var/qmail/bin/checkpoppasswd \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | \
/var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d &
The only real variable in this is getting your checkpasswd/checkpoppasswd
functioning - advice on testing your checkpasswd is available on www.qmail.org
Paul Gregg
--
Email pgregg at tibus.net | T: +44 (0) 1232 424190 | CLUB24 INTERNET |
Technical Director | F: +44 (0) 1232 424709 | Free Access |
The Internet Business Ltd | W: http://www.tibus.net | www.club24.co.uk |
Hello,
I installed Bruce Guenter's qmail rpm. I have two problems:
1. I cannot stop qmail or qmail-smtpd. The init.d script says it's
already down and if I try to kill it, it's restarted (by supervise)?
Did I install something wrong or do you know how I could stop it?
2. qmail-smtpd does not care about /etc/tcprules/smtp.cdb. I cannot
send mails localy via smtp, because the smtp does not relay. I put
127.0.0.1:allow, RELAYCLIENT=""
in smtp.rules and make a new smtp.cdb with tcprules, but it doesn't
help. Is there anything I have to configure, before smtp.cdb is used?
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:28:34AM +0100, Smoerk wrote:
> 2. qmail-smtpd does not care about /etc/tcprules/smtp.cdb. I cannot
> send mails localy via smtp, because the smtp does not relay. I put
> 127.0.0.1:allow, RELAYCLIENT=""
^
Take the space out of there.
Chris
I soved the problem I was having earlier with POP3 authentication going very
slow (30 secs to more than minute) or sometimes timing out.
Server reboot. Not just a stop and start of the qmail-pop3 or tcpserver
daemon. Just a plain cold restart.
Probably a memory leak somewhere.
Jose
|
sorry,but I have a question:
I used the qmail last year.for
some reasons, we have choised aonther commerical product.so how can I
unsubscribe?
|
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:15:04AM +0800, tao tao wrote:
> I used the qmail last year.for some reasons, we have choised aonther
> commerical product.so how can I unsubscribe?
Don't. You'll be back..
--
Ruben :)
In Paul Gregg's "Single-UID based pop3 box HOWTO" He says:
When using Qmail with Maildir format, you will need to use qmail-popup ->
checkpasswd -> qmail-pop3d.
I'm not sure how to impliment this in my startup scripts. I am using his
'checkpoppasswd'. Its located in /var/qmail/users. my passwd file is
/var/qmail/users/poppasswd.
How do I set up this scheme?
Eric
|
Dear all,
I am new to qmail and have a
problem here.
I have added the follwoing in
the .bash_profile
MAILUSER=my_isp_username
MAILHOST=my_isp_domain
QMAILINJECT=f
export MAILUSER MAILHOST
QMAILINJECT
Thank you,
Stein Ma
===== qmail bounced the following messages
====
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at durian.fidamy.com. I'm afraid I
wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a
permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Connected to
208.230.135.220 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 501 < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender
domain must exist ; ;
;
|
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 03:22:03PM +0800, Stein Ma wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am new to qmail and have a problem here.
> I have added the follwoing in the .bash_profile
> MAILUSER=my_isp_username
> MAILHOST=my_isp_domain
> QMAILINJECT=f
> export MAILUSER MAILHOST QMAILINJECT
>
> Thank you,
> Stein Ma
>
> ===== qmail bounced the following messages ====
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at durian.fidamy.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Connected to 208.230.135.220 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said: 501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must exist
You probably don't run plain vanilla qmail. You are probably using a patched
version of qmail that validates whether the senders domain is valid in DNS or
not. Alternatively, you run some spam-check delivery plug-in for the user
that handles mail for the address above. Either such a spam check or a
patched qmail is doing the bouncing.
Read instructions to the patch/spamchecker and correct behavior.
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 03:22:03PM +0800, Stein Ma wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am new to qmail and have a problem here.
>
> I have added the follwoing in the .bash_profile
>
> MAILUSER=my_isp_username
>
> MAILHOST=my_isp_domain
>
> QMAILINJECT=f
You must also set QMAILSUSER=my_isp_username and
QMAILSHOST=my_isp_domain to set your envelope sender correctly.
>
> export MAILUSER MAILHOST QMAILINJECT
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Stein Ma
>
>
>
> ===== qmail bounced the following messages ====
>
>
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at durian.fidamy.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
> addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> <[1][EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Connected to 208.230.135.220 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said: 501 <[2][EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain
> must exist
> ;
>
> ;
>
> ;
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
See complete headers for more info
Dear Sir,
I read <Mail queue with
qmail> and have encountered a problem.
I followed the instruction
given but the mail in ~alias/pppdir/new
keep sitting there and there is an
error:
#/usr/local/bin/maildirsmtp
~alias/pppdir alias-ppp- x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
where x.x.x.x is my ISP smtp server IP address
y.y.y.y is my dynamic IP address
The command output shown:
maildirserial: fatal: unable
to run tcpclient: file does not exist
maildirserial:
fatal: unable to run tcpclient: file does not exist
maildirserial: fatal: unable to run tcpclient:
file does not exist
maildirserial: fatal: making no progress: giving
up
Please help.
Thank you,
Stein Ma
|
Hi,
A mail is delivered while it should bounce.. I dont' understand why
Can you look at that :
[root@mumbly ds]# cat /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts |grep xtremself.com
xtremself.com
[root@mumbly ds]# cat /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains\
|grep xtremself.com
xtremself.com:xtrem
[root@mumbly ds]# file /home/xtrem/.qmail-titou
/home/xtrem/.qmail-titou: can't stat `/home/xtrem/.qmail-titou' (No
such file or directory.).
And if I mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (shouldn't exist !) :
Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.383069 new msg 340065
Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.383443 info msg 340065: bytes
222 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 495 uid 0
Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.613026 starting delivery 86186:
msg 340065 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.613335 status: local 1/10
remote 0/20Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.984718 delivery
86186: success: did_1+0+0/
Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.985044 status: local 0/10
remote 0/20Feb 29 10:04:32 mumbly splogger: 951815072.985257 end msg
340065
So the messages goes in a POP but I don't understand why... it should be
bounced...
Otherwise my qmail server perfectly works but I don't understand this pb
and I never had it.
Thanks!
PS :
[root@mumbly /root]# find / -name '.qmail-titou'
[root@mumbly /root]#
_______________
Dimitri SZAJMAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xon-xoff.fr
