Actually I just figured it out. I was called multilog wrong. I'm using
Bruce G's rpm's and he does some stuff around his $logger varible in his
init scripts that altered the command sequence a little, basically cause
his scripts were built for his logger qfilelog.
I now have time stamps, so really all I need to do is call tai64nfrac
through matchup, right?
Thanks
-jeremy
> Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, this part I don't understand. I'm using the t option, yet in my
> > long I see no timestamp at all. Tmp is just a sample output from
> > multilog.
>
> What does your multilog command line look like? Order of actions is
> significant.
>
> --
> Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
>
http://www.xxedgexx.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------
