On 13-Apr-2000, Kai MacTane wrote: > At 4/13/2000 10:28 AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote or quoted: > >Yes, anyone has such code. It's now at http://www.qmail.org/no-alternative. > This looks pretty cool, but it would be even cooler if it could be set to > generate a bounce message to the sender, telling them that this email > address doesn't accept HTML mail. FYI, ezmlm (ezmlm-idx?) can reject messages whose MIME type is listed in a pre-defined list, if you're interested to see how it does it. Actually, I'm thinking something like this in .qmail would work, wouldn't it? | if [ formail -xz "Content-Type:" |grep -iq "multipart/alternative" ] \ ; then echo "Sorry this mailbox does not accept messages of \ MIME-type 'multipart/alternative'"; exit 100; else exit 0; fi ./Maildir/ Otherwise, maybe procmail is our best friend. Ronny
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Russell Nelson
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Petr Novotny
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Russell Nelson
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Kai MacTane
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Russell Nelson
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Alex
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Kai MacTane
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful rogers-qmail
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Peter van Dijk
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Andy Bradford
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Ronny Haryanto
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Kai MacTane
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Peter van Dijk
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Scott D. Yelich
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Martin Randall
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Scott D. Yelich
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Bruno Wolff III
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green