qmail Digest 27 Apr 2000 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 984
Topics (messages 40647 through 40671):
Qmail installation on FreeBSD 4 following LWQ didn't work out
40647 by: Gabriel Ambuehl
40651 by: Neil Blakey-Milner
40655 by: Mads E Eilertsen
40663 by: Neil Blakey-Milner
to get qmail system administrators name in the LOG file
40648 by: ravivr.hss.hns.com
Re: Can't send via Mail.app on NeXT
40649 by: Michael Friendly
Q: ETRN + Qmail
40650 by: Anton Pirnat
40652 by: Anton Pirnat
40662 by: Markus Stumpf
QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch
40653 by: Laura Donovan
40657 by: Will Harris
qmail inserting from: anonymous
40654 by: Paul Farber
'anonymous' problem
40656 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: queue-fix 1.4 won't compile on IRIX6.5.3m
40658 by: Will Harris
Re: qmail-smtpd logging
40659 by: Markus Stumpf
Re: AutoTURN ISP?
40660 by: Markus Stumpf
40661 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: How do I enable user nobody to use qmail-inject?
40664 by: Mikko Hänninen
Re: Internet mail
40665 by: R.Ilker Gokhan
Re: suse and qmail
40666 by: Russell Nelson
Re: temporary failure warning message
40667 by: Aaron L. Meehan
Compilation errors
40668 by: Isaiah Chua
messages sent to msglog??
40669 by: Madhav
selective forwarding.
40670 by: Colin Humphreys
qmail-uce works in vpopmail environment ?
40671 by: mack.ms1.hinet.net
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, I just attempted to install qmail on a FreeBSD 4 box following LWQ (which did always work for my SuSE Linux boxes). I installed qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp using the respective ports but when I try root@beta 14:20:58 /etc/init.d # qmail start # (I put it there as I couldn't find another init.d dir on FreeBSD) I just Starting qmail: svscan. env: root@beta 14:21:02 /etc/init.d # svscan: No such file or directory (now the system is blocked until I hit ^C). Where has svscan gone? Is the port perhaps broken (meaning: should I do make deinstall and attempt to install the packages manually, ignoring all advice that FreeBSD people are giving)? Best regards, Gabriel
On Wed 2000-04-26 (14:21), Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > I just attempted to install qmail on a FreeBSD 4 box following LWQ > (which did always work for my SuSE Linux boxes). I installed qmail, > daemontools and ucspi-tcp using the respective ports but when I try > > root@beta 14:20:58 /etc/init.d # qmail start # (I put it there as I couldn't find >another init.d dir on FreeBSD) I just > Starting qmail: svscan. > env: root@beta 14:21:02 /etc/init.d # svscan: No such file or directory The FreeBSD daemontools port is at version 0.53 (which doesn't have svscan). Because of the changes in program names and so forth, the previous maintainer got a bit irritated and didn't upgrade it. I'm currently responsible for upgrading it. (if anyone has some wrapper scripts that emulate the old commands, now is the time to pipe up *grin*) > and attempt to install the packages manually, ignoring all advice > that FreeBSD people are giving)? If you're unable to wait a day or two, it won't kill you if you install it manually. I should get around to upgrading it tomorrow, if not in the next few hours. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Alpha Geek, Sunesi Clinical Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: [...] svscan: No such file or directory If you install daemontools according to the instructions, svscan will be in /usr/local/bin, or where you specified it to be (conf-home). > [...] ignoring all advice > that FreeBSD people are giving)? If you installed it as a package svscan might be somewhere else, or, as in you case, not there at all due to an old version. DJB has made it easy to grab the latest version and follow some very simple installation instructions. I've installed daemontools a couple of times now, on FreeBSD and other platforms, and never felt any need for a package. What are the specific arguments against doing this on FreeBSD? Mads
On Wed 2000-04-26 (17:35), Mads E Eilertsen wrote: > I've installed daemontools a couple of times now, on FreeBSD and other > platforms, and never felt any need for a package. What are the > specific arguments against doing this on FreeBSD? Like on most other platforms - it makes it harder for some people to manage their installed software. Some people have grown up always installing their own stuff, and other have arrived and always used packages - neither are any more correct. FreeBSD ports basically contain patches to the original pristeen distribution file which are necessary to get that software to perform correctly on FreeBSD - much like you'd have to do manually to port something. This doesn't apply to well-behaved applications, like qmail, but those applications are still in ports, just without patches. It just makes it easier for lots of people to install software if you do it the same way all the time, and all the hard porting work is done for you already. With Debian, for example, they have a very powerful package dependency system, and simple commands to upgrade all installed packages to the latest version. Lots of people seem to like it. So, the argument against it is that you might not be able to manage that application as easily if you did it yourself. But only if that applies to you. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Hacker In Chief, Sunesi Clinical Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all, As we know that the Qmail delivers the delivery failure report(ie,bounced back mail)to the sender thru qmail-send program. But in the logs I dont get the name of MAILER-DAEMON/SYSTEM-ADMIN , but I simply get a BLANK name (ie, no from ID). How can I modify this so that in the logs I should get MY SYSTEM-ADMINISTRATOR name instead of BLANK name. Can anyone pls suggest regarding this. Thanks in Advance, Rgds, RAVI.V.R
I had an open mail-relay with an older version of sendmail, and got qmail installed on my system. Now, I can send mail from pine, but not from Mail.app. I can't get any help locally, so I'm hoping someone can help me sort this out. When I send from Mail.app, I get replies from the mailer-daemon like this: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at hotspur.psych.yorku.ca. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <Georges Monette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named mathstat.yorku.ca>. (#5.1.2) Does this message number give any clue to what is wrong? I can send email OK via pine, so qmail-send is working, but not from the NeXT Mail.app GUI mail program, which is so much easier than pine. In the Mail.app preferences, the Mailer is set to /usr/lib/sendmail which is symlinked to qmail: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 23 Apr 6 22:20 /usr/lib/sendmail -> /var/qmail/bin/sendmail*@ Can anyone tell me what to try or where to look to figure this out? thanks, Michael Friendly Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NeXTmail OK) Psychology Dept York University Voice: 416 736-5115 Fax: 416 736-5814 4700 Keele Street http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/friendly.html Toronto, ONT M3J 1P3 CANADA
Hi there, someone of our customers was asking for ETRN support but i haven´ t seen anything about it on qmail docs nor other sources. It seems there are different views about ETRN and its possible dis-/advantages. As most/lots providers are paid by a time based fee so maybe they have no reason so save time to their customer. However, the main pro for ETRN would be for dial-up connections that host its own mail servers on their side. I only found a (seems to be) outdated website for »ETRN for qmail 0.1f, 1998« but nothing else. Anyone who can tell me more or hint me some more URLs/Sources about ETRN and/or ETRN and qmail? Or there are some reasons not to use ETRN? Any hints are welcome! Regards Anton Pirnat -- this mesage is shareware, please register! Geesh.. am i under 10 typos per line now?
It is that late? It seems i am getting older than expected.. dammn computers.. :) Just found some more about »serialmail« on DJB´s site.. It eems to be some like ETRN and a bunch more.. Maybe this works, if not i put my puters to the trash (hey, i was kidding ;).. Anton Pirnat -- is there any life before breakfast? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Am 26.04.00, 15:21:24, schrieb Anton Pirnat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> zum Thema Q: ETRN + Qmail: > Hi there, > someone of our customers was asking for ETRN support but i haven´ t > seen anything about it on qmail docs nor other sources. It seems there > are different views about ETRN and its possible dis-/advantages. As > most/lots providers are paid by a time based fee so maybe they have no > reason so save time to their customer. However, the main pro for ETRN > would be for dial-up connections that host its own mail servers on > their side. > I only found a (seems to be) outdated website for »ETRN for qmail > 0.1f, 1998« but nothing else. > Anyone who can tell me more or hint me some more URLs/Sources about > ETRN and/or ETRN and qmail? Or there are some reasons not to use ETRN? > Any hints are welcome! > Regards > Anton Pirnat > -- > this mesage is shareware, please register! > Geesh.. am i under 10 typos per line now?
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 02:43:47PM +0000, Anton Pirnat wrote: > Just found some more about »serialmail« on DJB´s site.. It eems to be > some like ETRN and a bunch more.. Maybe this works, if not i put my > puters to the trash (hey, i was kidding ;).. Maybe this is of interest to you. Besides the instructions that come with the serialmail package I use a slightly different approach. We don't save the "ETRN" messages associated with an IP but with a domain name and use the follwing lines as a wrapper for qmail-smtpd: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/bin/sh /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd exec </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 [ ! -z "$ETRN" ] && { ( /var/qmail/bin/sm-etrn $ETRN </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 ) & } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In the cdb file for tcpserver we use e.g. 195.30.1.54:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",ETRN="lagrange.space.net" 195.30.1.100:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",ETRN="lagrange.space.net" Thus also other IP adresses can trigger delivery for "lagrange.space.net". This is useful if customers can't trigger the delivery from the host their mail server is running on. The sm-etrn script utilizes a file called "RELAYHOST" in the store directory of the domain to get the name/IP address of the mail exchanger to use and also uses this file (with flock'ing) to determine whether there is already a delivery to this host in process. \Maex -- SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | realize you haven't D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
Hello, I am currently testing out the QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch - http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/qmail-uce.html - and was wondering if anyone else has tried it or heard anything about it. Also, the README says to run "patch <qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff", but when I do I get the following message: # patch <qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff can't find file to patch at input line 4 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r -U 3 ../qmail-1.03.orig/Makefile ./Makefile |--- ../qmail-1.03.orig/Makefile Mon Jun 15 06:53:16 1998 |+++ ./Makefile Tue May 4 21:44:10 1999 -------------------------- File to patch: Line 4 of qmail-uce.diff says "@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@". I am running Redhat 6.1 - does anyone know what I need to go to get this to work? Thanks! -Laura
At 15:23 26.4.2000, Laura Donovan wrote: >Hello, > >I am currently testing out the QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch - >http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/qmail-uce.html - and >was wondering if anyone else has tried it or heard anything about it. >Also, the README says to run "patch <qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff", but when >I do I get the following message: > ># patch <qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff > >can't find file to patch at input line 4 Make sure you're in the qmail source code directory when you try to apply the patch... Will __________________________________________________________________________ "I was going to be a Neo-Deconstructivist, but Mom wouldn't let me..." multimedia laboratorium [EMAIL PROTECTED] institut fuer informatik (pgp id) F703D035 der universitaet zuerich (office) +41 1 635 4346 winterthurerstr. 190 (fax) +41 1 635 6809 ch-8057 zuerich (mobile) +41 76 372 0913 switzerland www.ifi.unizh.ch/~harris __________________________________________________________________________
I have a Formmail script on a web server, and whenever I send a message, qmail logs it from 'anonymous'. I grepped the script and there is no anonymous text string. My guess is that qmail is inserting it. Should I set an environment variable to get rid of it or is there something more sinister going on? Apr 26 06:14:52 localhost qmail: 956744092.582590 new msg 1860 Apr 26 06:14:52 localhost qmail: 956744092.582794 info msg 1860: bytes 590 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 14266 uid 504 Apr 26 06:14:52 localhost qmail: 956744092.844474 starting delivery 65: msg 1860 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 26 06:14:52 localhost qmail: 956744092.844593 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 Apr 26 06:14:53 localhost qmail: 956744093.117810 delivery 65: success: 208.149.160.16_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_956758286_qp_20893/ Apr 26 06:14:53 localhost qmail: 956744093.118837 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Apr 26 06:14:53 localhost qmail: 956744093.119128 end msg 1860 ( Paul Farber Farber Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545
Sorry, removed that message by accident. It is this piece of code that does it: mailuser = env_get("QMAILUSER"); if (!mailuser) mailuser = env_get("MAILUSER"); if (!mailuser) mailuser = env_get("USER"); if (!mailuser) mailuser = env_get("LOGNAME"); if (!mailuser) mailuser = "anonymous"; in qmail-inject.c. Hope that clears it up. Greetz, Peter. -- Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder | | 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; | C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.' | Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
At 21:50 24.4.2000, John McCoy, Jr wrote: >I've been trying to figure this one out with no luck. > >When compiling queue-fix it gives the following error: >./makelib str.a str_len.o str_diff.o str_diffn.o str_cpy.o \ > str_chr.o str_rchr.o str_start.o byte_chr.o byte_rchr.o \ > byte_diff.o byte_copy.o byte_cr.o byte_zero.o > ./load queue-fix fifo.o fs.a stralloc.a getln.a open.a error.a \ > substdio.a alloc.a str.a >ld32: Segmentation fault. Removing output file... >*** Error code 1 (bu21) Looks to me like you're trying to use the SGI linker to link gcc object files. Make sure you have put gcc into any relevant makefiles or configuration files (conf-ld?). If you use ld (the default) it will simply call the system linker, which is the MIPSPro ld32 linker. Will __________________________________________________________________________ "I was going to be a Neo-Deconstructivist, but Mom wouldn't let me..." multimedia laboratorium [EMAIL PROTECTED] institut fuer informatik (pgp id) F703D035 der universitaet zuerich (office) +41 1 635 4346 winterthurerstr. 190 (fax) +41 1 635 6809 ch-8057 zuerich (mobile) +41 76 372 0913 switzerland www.ifi.unizh.ch/~harris __________________________________________________________________________
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 10:00:24PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote: > I modified qmail-smtpd to log that error message to stderr. That told > me the new network, and I enabled many customers to have a happy Easter. I have made some more logging-mods to qmail-smtpd than in my patch that is also reachable via www.qmail.org. I also find them very useful and sometimes also frithening what crap other mailserver send. It is also good in finding broken mailservers that send 2 messages with stray newlines every second and thus put quite some load on your mailserver. I can't provide a patch at the moment (still using 1.01, too) but I'll upgrade to 1.03 RSN and will try to extract a logging patch that I will publish on my qmail page and announce it in this list. \Maex -- SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | realize you haven't D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 07:06:13AM -0700, Glenn Strauss wrote: > My primary MX is currently on the end of a DSL line with a static IP, > but when that goes down, I'll have a dynamic IP on the end of a dial-up > line (so SMTP ETRN is out). In this case the AutoTURN is no option for you, as with the standard setup you still need a static IP address. However, maybe someone wrote a system similar to "SMTP after POP" that does "SMTP-send after POP". \Maex -- SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | realize you haven't D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 07:06:13AM -0700, Glenn Strauss wrote: > > My primary MX is currently on the end of a DSL line with a static IP, > > but when that goes down, I'll have a dynamic IP on the end of a dial-up > > line (so SMTP ETRN is out). > > In this case the AutoTURN is no option for you, as with the standard > setup you still need a static IP address. > However, maybe someone wrote a system similar to "SMTP after POP" that > does "SMTP-send after POP". I have implemented (but not tested yet ;) this as part of my virtual-domain checkpassword replacement. It's not opensource (yet), unfortunately. Greetz, Peter. -- Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder | | 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; | C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.' | Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
Geoff Everist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 25 Apr 2000: > Basically it appears to send mail, but all I get is the dreaded > qmail-inject: fatal: read error message in my apache error log, and the > mail disappears into the void. Any ideas will be greatly appreciated. I forget the earlier details from you, but obviously the problem is that QMAILMFTFILE environment variable is getting inherited and pointing to a wrong user's ~/.lists which can't be read. You simply need to make sure that the variable gets undefined (or re-defined to a proper place) before running qmail-inject, perhaps with the help of a shell wrapper script or something like that. Regards, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs / If you have to run heating in winter, you don't own enough computers.
Title: RE: Internet mailThank you again Dave. It works fine. But I have some more question about qmail.
In the following case, if domain name is test.com and QmailA's hostname is deneme.test.com, does username must be @deneme.test.com or does it may be @test.com? if yes how can i set? because when i have sent a mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from any client that is using QmailA. QmailA is trying to forward to QmailB. However user1 is belong to QmailA.Sorry my broken English..
Ilker G.-----Original Message-----
From: R.Ilker Gokhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:20 PM
To: 'Dave Sill'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Internet mail
Thank you very much for reply... i will try immediately..
see you....
Ilker G.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:14 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Internet mail
"R.Ilker Gokhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Help me please!!!!1
I'll try.
>Ok. I am changing my question. I assume I have two Qmail server.
>
>user name QmailA hostname QmailB hostname
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>deneme.test.com---->deneme2.test.com--------> internet
>
>I want to set if deneme.test.com receive a request e-mail to internet (for
>example [EMAIL PROTECTED]) it forwards to deneme2.test.com.
>
>How can I set this configuration?
You have two qmail hosts: deneme.test.com and deneme2.test.com. Users
submit mail to deneme.test.com. If the mail is not for a local
recipient, you want it forwarded to deneme2.test.com?
If that's right, set up deneme.test.com with the usual control files,
then create control/smtproutes with the following:
:deneme2.test.com
That says "deliver all remote mail to deneme2.test.com".
-Dave
Neil Blakey-Milner writes: > Are they allowed to package qmail? Of course. Anyone is, as long as they obey Dan's conditions. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
Quoting Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Chris Hardie writes: > > Unfortunately, that link appears to be broken. Brian Wightman, please > > pick up the nearest courtesy phone. > > It's also temporarily available as > http://www.qmail.org/qmail_bounce-0.0alpha6.tar.gz . If Brian doesn't > show up too soon, I'll change the link to point to my server. I'm pretty sure I remember seeing a post from Brian some time back where he stated he was no longer working on the notifier. He asked for volunteers to pick up the slack, I think. Aaron
bash# make setup check
( ( ./compile tryvfork.c && ./load tryvfork ) >/dev/null \
2>&1 \
&& cat fork.h2 || cat fork.h1 ) > fork.h
rm -f tryvfork.o tryvfork
./compile qmail-local.c
qmail-local.c: In function `main':
qmail-local.c:448: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
./compile qmail.c
./compile quote.c
./compile now.c
./compile gfrom.c
./compile myctime.c
./compile slurpclose.c
./compile case_diffb.c
./compile case_diffs.c
./compile case_lowerb.c
./compile case_lowers.c
./compile case_starts.c
./makelib case.a case_diffb.o case_diffs.o case_lowerb.o \
case_lowers.o case_starts.o
./compile getln.c
./compile getln2.c
./makelib getln.a getln.o getln2.o
./compile subgetopt.c
./compile sgetopt.c
./makelib getopt.a subgetopt.o sgetopt.o
./compile sig_alarm.c
In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300,
from sig_alarm.c:1:
/usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm/sigcontext.h: No such file or
directory
make: *** [sig_alarm.o] Error 1I already have all the GNU C compilers installed on the server.Anyone has any ideas why?
hi, i use a RH 6.1 and i have installed qmail in one machine using rpms from "bruceg-qmail+patches" and it is working fine. but when i send mails i see a delivery made to msglog (also i am unable to find where this is stored) i don't want to keep a copy of the mails sent. so how do i disable it. thanks in advance madhav following is the log of a message sent to the user admin from msk. Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.956421 new msg 1179 Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.959523 info msg 1179: bytes 562 from <m [EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 1096 uid 104 Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966473 starting delivery 10: msg 1179 t o local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966605 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966704 starting delivery 11: msg 1179 t o local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966791 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 956811110.005985 delivery 10: success: did_0+0+0/ Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 956811110.008519 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 956811110.022083 delivery 11: success: did_1+0+0/ Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 956811110.025899 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 956811110.039822 end msg 1179 Apr 27 10:22:59 server1 pop3d: 956811179.747342 tcpserver: status: 1/20 Apr 27 10:22:59 server1 pop3d: 956811179.749922 tcpserver: pid 1101 from 172.16. 31.72 Apr 27 10:22:59 server1 pop3d: 956811179.753880 tcpserver: ok 1101 :10.1.10.25:1 10 :172.16.31.72::4410 Apr 27 10:23:00 server1 pop3d: 956811180.091642 tcpserver: end 1101 status 256 Apr 27 10:23:00 server1 pop3d: 956811180.093858 tcpserver: status: 0/20
Hi, I am currently setting up a qmail email server that will soon become part of a distributed system of servers. I have a couple of questions about things I am having trouble with. The servers are going to be of the form server1.mydomain.com server2.mydomain.com and so on email sent to an address at mydomain.com will be alliased to the correct server e.g [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the seperate servers, server1, server2 and so on will have MX records for mydomain.com and will have access to a synced aliases file. How do I get this aliasing file to work? This system is not yet ready, so at the moment I just want to catch certain addresses that come through addressed to mydomain.com but let others continue on to the real mydomain.com. Is this possible? Thanks, Colin
Hi there, I am having qmail+vpopmail running on Solaris and am looking for some ways to let my vpopmail account users to have his/her own mail filter to reject mails. I saw 'qmail-uce' on the net. It looks like a good way to try, but I am wondering if it works well with vpopmail environment. Can qmail-uce (w/maildrop or procmail) recognize individual user's filter recipe under a vpopmail account's home directory? (say, /home/vpopmail/domains/virtual.net/user1/rcptfilter) Any idea ? Thanks in advance ------------ Wang-hua Li
