Peter van Dijk wrote:

> [the 821] definition is incorrect, in that it allows stuff like
> [10.10.10.1].vuurwerk.nl
> 
> I think this was superseded in a later RFC.

Thanks, all!

I wonder if Postel meant for constructions such as Peter's error
to signify numeric addresses internal to private networks.  This
would be in keeping with 821's emphasis on source routing.
__________________________________________________________________
                          David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to