> On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Craig L. Ching wrote:
> ! Thanks, I'll give that a shot! Now, the TEST.receive
> example looks nothing
> ! like this.
>
> Sure it does! That document skimped out on writing ``mail from:'' and
> ``rcpt to:'' fully, but does have a note later on saying ``(Note for
> programmers: Most SMTP servers need more text after MAIL and RCPT.
> See RFC 821.)''. ``ehlo'' is defined in RFC 1869, but for qmail-smtpd
> behaves almost identically to ``helo''.
>
> Other than those, how different is my snippet from TEST.receive's one?
>
Ooops! I didn't read carefully enough! Just following the text without
thinking, sorry!
> ! Should it? Or should my configuration not
> worry about that? I
> ! just want to make sure I have everything set up correctly.
>
> Well, if either works, you're in business.
>
Excellent! Thanks much for your help and everyone else's help as well. I
also want to thank Dave Sill for "Life With qmail", read that over the
weekend. Guess I'd better go out and get the RFC's now!
> ---Chris K.
> --
> Chris, the Young One |_ Never brag about how your machines
> haven't been
> Auckland, New Zealand |_ hacked, or your code hasn't been
> broken. It's
> http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ guaranteed to bring the wrong kind of
> PGP: 0xCCC6114E/0x706A6AAD |_ attention. ---Neil Schneider
>
Cheers,
Craig
