Agreed: PGP (et. al.) is definately the answer, not server-to-server encryption. However, properly authenticated DNS (or an evolution thereof) and resulting authenticated (S/Q)MTP sessions would be a leap forward as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The problem with your solution is that server to server encryption > does not stop government and big corporations from looking at your > mail on the mail server after it has arrived. Ask any system admin > how hard it is to scan /var/mail or a users home directory. Answer, > it's trivial.
- Open letter Patrick Lambert
- Re: Open letter markd
- Re: Open letter Adam McKenna
- Re: Open letter markd
- Re: Open letter Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Open letter Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Open letter Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Open letter Blackey
- Re: Open letter Dave Sill
- Re: Open letter Dave Sill
- RE: Open letter Ihnen, David
- Re: [offtopic?] RE: Encryption (was: Open lett... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: [offtopic?] RE: Encryption (was: Open ... Adam McKenna
- Re: [offtopic?] RE: Encryption (was: O... Dave Sill
- Re: [offtopic?] RE: Encryption (w... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Open letter David L. Nicol