On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 04:38:35PM +1200, Chris K. Young wrote: > I'm not even sure that ezmlm and ucspi-tcp are distributable at all. > > > This has always > > confused me as ucspi-tcp atleast doesn't have unreasonable installation > > guidelines by default, why is it being distributed as source only? > > As far as I understand, unless a licence is given, all rights are > reserved. Exactly. So we will need a license on those packages to get it in. But that should be doable, shouldn't it? bye Torsten
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qm... Adam McKenna
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: va... Gerrit Pape
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages... Russell Nelson
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Pac... Gerrit Pape
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato)... Russell Nelson
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages... Torsten Landschoff
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qm... Jamie Heilman
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: va... Chris K. Young
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages... Jamie Heilman
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages... Torsten Landschoff
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Pac... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qm... Torsten Landschoff
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qm... Gerrit Pape
- Re: Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qmail Torsten Landschoff
- Debian GNU/Linux (potato) Packages: var-qmail Gerrit Pape